A 25-year-old United Airlines passenger said she was forced to sit next to a man who pleasured himself while staring at her during an early morning flight ahead of Labor Day weekend.

The passenger said she was also surprised to learn that, despite reporting the incident to flight staff, the airline did not inform law enforcement, and the man deplaned at Newark Liberty International Airport in Newark, New Jersey, as if nothing had happened.

The woman, whose name NBC News is withholding because she is a victim of an alleged sexual offense, said she was permitted to stand for part of the roughly one-hour regional flight from Rochester, New York, to Newark that took off at 6 a.m. Sept. 3.

A pediatric crisis therapist who lives in western New York, she said it was the first leg of her trip to visit friends for the weekend in Boston. When flight attendants began to prepare for landing, the woman told NBC News, she was told she had to return to her seat in spite of the sexual harassment she reported, because there were no other available seats.

“On multiple instances, I said I feel uncomfortable doing that,” the woman said.

She said a flight attendant told her she would only be sitting for three to five minutes, but the landing process took much longer, and her seat was near the back of the plane, so she spent additional time alongside the man before deplaning.

The woman described the man as roughly 35 to 40 years of age, wearing hiking pants and a T-shirt. He was “pretty normal looking” and “unassuming,” she said.

“I just got the sense had done it before ... People don’t just do those things at 6 a.m.,” she said. The airline’s handling of the issue made the upsetting encounter worse, she added.

According to the passenger, she approached a United agent at the gate who was rude and curt. The woman told the agent that her seatmate was not stopped at the gate and that she was “concerned he’s on his next flight.”

“What am I supposed to do about it?” the agent allegedly told her. He said it was her responsibility to request a police response, she said.

Another United employee later told her that protocols weren’t followed and advised her to complain to the airline. She said she filed grievances with United Airlines and the Federal Aviation Administration. Later, she said, she also called the FBI.

In an emailed response to NBC News’ request for comment, United did not immediately provide details about the report or how it was handled. “We’re currently looking into this and don’t have anything additional to share right now,” a spokesperson said.

The FAA and the FBI also declined to comment.

That’s brutal. Real nightmare fuel from beginning to end.

“What am I supposed to do about it?” the agent allegedly told her.

"good morning passengers on flight 677 to New Jersey...we remind you wanking is rows 39-49 only."

While I hate reading this stuff, I appreciate you posting it.

I can't imagine having so little empathy for my fellow human beings. But I think most of us can't, thankfully. Except road rage. We all road rage. But when driving, we see cars, not people. I can't imagine being that nasty with an unconsenting other person. :(

I was so sad to see that no one stood up for this woman. No passengers, no flight attendants, no one.

The very least someone could have done is pulled out a phone and recorded the guy. Offer to switch seats. Punch the gooner in the dick. Something.

They even made HER stand (when they should have duct taped the sexual predator in the galley or somewhere).

This is the kinda shit that makes me question all the smart-glasses hate, two-party-voice-recording-consent-laws, even up-skirt recording laws, all of it:

In what world does that man deserve the expecation of privacy, or even to know if she had recorded him somehow? The governments, Google, X, Meta, their peers, and the media, are all mishandling this shit on purpose to protect people like him and their enablers(the airline, in this case), and the public is gobbling their shit-sandwich narrative like its the most delicious and true thing ever.

I'm not saying we don't need stalking and harrassment laws, or consent for image distribution, at least when all but one victim in-frame are either blurred out or just indiscernable/irrelavent. What I'm getting at is that 99.9999999% of those cases would be covered by proper enforcement of existing laws. Hell, I'm cool with using AI to scour all existing content for purposes of contacting people in it to see if they consented or NOT and provide them free legal-assistange, post-hoc with no statute of limitations.

On the other hand, the law-books are long-past cluttered to the point that the only things enforced are either en vogue among law-enforcement or brought to the media, and fuck the victims if they aren't rich or photogenic-enough to force the issue.

She didn't need to record him for United to take action.

Currently, those smart glasses are being used primarily by men recording women without their consent and uploading those videos online.

If she had recorded him, United would have taken immediate action, or at least the first person to take here seriously probably would have been someone in-person, when she was still in-crisis and most in-need of well-warranted validation.

You're blinded by your love of smart glasses here.

Even if recording him would have forced the flight attendants to take action, she doesn't need smart glasses to do that. She could have used her phone.

"love of smart-glasses" lol. Don't own any and not interested in purchasing them. Now, when I go back to university, iirc, they already have rules against recording lectures, so setting up a go-pro is out of the question, so for that one-purpose, I could be tempted ...

... but outside of that, no, regarding the glasses, specifically, you've got the wrong guy, but the death of Aaron Schwartz hit me harder than 9/11, so excuse me if I'm at least as contemptuous of your stance as you believe you are right to be of mine. I'm not even convince you've formed your own opinion on the matter, and not just had it handed to you with all sorts of terms and conditions you haven't read and would protest orange-man-style until your dieing-day if they turned on you.

NO, I'm not asking you to convince me of your edification, but if you could kindly step-the-fuck-back from impugning my character long-enough to even try to understand what I'm saying, that would be great.

This is the kinda shit that makes me question all the smart-glasses hate, two-party-voice-recording-consent-laws, even up-skirt recording laws, all of it

I'm simply reacting to your assertion that smart glasses would have fixed this situation for this woman.

You don't need to guilt trip me about Aaron fucking Schwartz to make your point.

You don't have to reply to my comments mid-edit* either, within a minute or so of when I started typing the comment and don't even recall hitting submit before seeing your immediate reply, but here we are. Reading is quicker than composition, sure, but you haven't even taken a niblble, let-alone digested a crum of it beyond the toddler's "eww! broccoli! so gross!"-stage.

* The only reason I know/will-admit its an edit is because that's the only way your Reply could have been so immediate and mention Aaron. Otherwise, you're a mind-reader or just know too much about me and are still creeping me out even after realizing I must have been editting the comment. Okay, so, setting-aside you topc-digestion, maybe pretend I'm just that stupid, slow, easilly-spooked, what-have-you. I don't even mind.

You don’t have to reply to my comments mid-edit* either

You could always make sure your replies are ready before you hit 'Reply'.

Well now we have the economy, economy plus and economy plus wank.

  • united airlines in an attempt to fix this shit

United was also caught transporting either military parts or weapons for Israel on passenger flights

While that's not great, it has nothing to do with this story.

Yea it does, United.

Ok.

midwest.social

Rules

  1. No porn.
  2. No bigotry, hate speech.
  3. No ads / spamming.
  4. No conspiracies / QAnon / antivaxx sentiment
  5. No zionists
  6. No fascists

Chat Room

Matrix chat room: https://matrix.to/#/#midwestsociallemmy:matrix.org

Communities

Communities from our friends:

Donations

LiberaPay link: https://liberapay.com/seahorse