Julia Curlee briefed presidents and became the White House’s senior career intelligence official. Then a far-right campaign targeted her for being transgender.

Julia Curlee spent nearly two decades carrying the country’s secrets.

She worked in war zones, traveled to 35 countries, briefed presidents, and boarded Air Force One with the President’s Daily Brief. She was trusted to decide what some of the world's most powerful people needed to know before beginning their days.

But in a remarkable first-person account published Monday by The Atlantic, Curlee describes how the second Trump administration came to view something else as dangerously sensitive: the fact that one of its most experienced intelligence officials was a transgender woman.

Her identity was never a secret inside the government. Trump officials had known about it during his first term, when Curlee briefed senior White House officials and became Vice President Mike Pence’s daily intelligence briefer. It became intolerable, she writes, only when the public might learn about it.

“The White House had needed me,” Curlee writes. “Trump officials had known I was trans from day one.”

Curlee joined the CIA in 2007 and became the first officer at the agency to transition openly and continue serving. She had dreamed of becoming an intelligence officer since childhood. Her other lifelong conviction — that she should have been born a woman — seemed, for years, incompatible with that calling.

She transitioned in 2013. Her first day at work as Julia passed without incident. Four years later, she wrote about the experience in The Atlantic under the pseudonym Jenny Hall, explaining how living openly had made her a more effective intelligence officer. The CIA later used the essay in college recruiting, according to Curlee.

Then came an assignment to prepare and deliver the President’s Daily Brief during Trump’s first administration. The work required arriving around midnight, studying intelligence through the early morning, and entering the West Wing before dawn.

Curlee eventually became Pence’s briefer. It was an unlikely pairing. Pence had spent years opposing marriage equality and LGBTQ+ rights. Curlee was a gay transgender woman, a wife, and a mother.

Yet Pence, she says, treated her as a trusted professional. He took notes, asked questions, and invited Curlee’s family to the White House when her assignment ended. There, he took her mother’s hand and said, “You must be very proud of your daughter.”

For Curlee, the moment proved that public service could rise above politics. She could serve an administration whose policies she opposed, and its leaders could recognize her expertise and humanity.

That belief brought her back to the White House under President Joe Biden, where she served as a National Security Council director. It also persuaded her to remain when Trump returned to office in January 2025.

As Biden’s political appointees departed, Curlee became the senior career intelligence official in the White House. She helped prepare the incoming administration to assume power, even as colleagues warned that she could become a target.

On Trump’s first day back in office, he signed an executive order directing the federal government to recognize only two sexes. Curlee began leaving the White House complex and crossing Pennsylvania Avenue to use restrooms in nearby coffee shops.

She stayed.

Three days into the administration, roughly 160 National Security Council employees detailed from other agencies were abruptly ordered to leave the White House. Curlee was spared. She assembled what remained of her team and continued briefing officials.

The arrangement lasted 69 days.

Curlee was visiting family in Roanoke, Virginia, when she received a Saturday phone call telling her that her White House assignment had ended. She said that officials did not explain. In the same conversation, they asked her to return Monday because they still needed her work.

After hanging up, Curlee saw that far-right provocateur Laura Loomer had posted about a transgender person “Biden holdover” inside the White House, accused the unnamed official of hating Trump, and asked her followers to help identify the person.

Curlee returned to work anyway. She spent three more days completing a budget project and transferring the portfolio she had managed for nearly two years.

“We need you. We need your service. But we don’t want anyone to know you are here,” she writes of the message she received.

Curlee does not claim to have proof that Trump or Loomer personally ordered her removal because she is transgender. She was never given a reason. But her account leaves little ambiguity about the sequence: Her identity had been known and accepted while her work remained useful and private. Once it threatened to become public, her service no longer protected her.

Days later, Trump fired several other National Security Council officials after meeting with Loomer, who had urged him to purge officials she considered insufficiently loyal.

Curlee returned to the CIA. There, she watched the agency dismantle its LGBTQ+ employee organization, remove Pride flags, and impose the administration’s restrictions on transgender workers. Earlier this year, she finally left the career she had once expected to hold for life.

In an accompanying Radio Atlantic interview, Curlee delivered a painful reversal of the message she once offered LGBTQ+ young people.

“Now I could not in good conscience advise any LGBT American to apply to work at CIA,” she said.

🗃️

I'm not a fan of the amount of victim blaming going on in this thread.

Anyway, here's my hot take: she doesn't deserve to be discriminated against.

Nobody on both threads are discriminating her for being trans. We are discriminating a snitch for snitching against others’ wills. What part of espionage is deserves blaming‽

FFS of all the people you KNOW can keep a fucking secret...

Trusting trans anarchists ⋙ CIA ≫ <img src="https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/6dedb145-206a-4b35-ab5e-c9e41e1130c7.png" alt="Amerikkka" width="16" height="auto"> fucking Presidents.

Seeing Florencia vouch for a snitch just because the snitch is 🏳️‍⚧️ was not in my <img src="https://quokk.au/static/media/posts/TU/MG/TUMGlPzS1hm6i8D.webp" alt="bingo" width="24" height="auto">

On Trump’s first day back in office, he signed an executive order directing the federal government to recognize only two sexes. Curlee began leaving the White House complex and crossing Pennsylvania Avenue to use restrooms in nearby coffee shops.

She stayed.

This is where my sympathy for her evaporated, and even causes me to question her judgment.

Make no mistake - I don’t agree with the administration’s actions, even a little. However, staying in a situation where you’re clearly, undeniably not wanted is a terrible choice.

Should climate scientists just quit then because Trump doesn't like what they're telling him about clean coal?

If your specific job is to advise Trump about climate science ... might as well, yeah. That's just a waste of time.

Yes, leave the country to for a place that will accept them and their talents. Let the cespit rot and guard a socity that accepts you and is worth fighting for. America isn't the only place on earth hiring people like this.

Yes, leave the country to for a place that will accept them and their talents. Let the cespit rot and guard a socity that accepts you and is worth fighting for. America isn’t the only place on earth hiring people like this.

No country or continent would have the resources to just accept all those climate scientists. And just letting people rot is not amongst their nature.

No country or continent would have the resources to just accept all those climate scientists.

Just how many climate scientists do you think there are in the US?

Non sequitur.

Should a spy spy?

Yes a spy should spy

Enjoy the consequences of spying without consent.

I do not understand what the consequences are in this context?

Do you comprehend what consent is?

Yes I do.

What are the consequences in this context?

Why just quit, they can flee to a country that still cares about climate science and continue working on important research. The US isn't going to produce anything worthwhile in that field for at least two more years, the only studies they'll fund are ones that say coal, oil and natural gas are good for the environment.

You’re acting like that’s so easy.

I sympathize with the notion, but quitting one's living is scary, especially if they have people To support. Immigrating somewhere else, finding a place that will take you, uprooting your whole life, is hard.

Actual insane argument. How the fuck do people think its so easy to just uproot and move like that. That is a major life choice and can be insanely hard and stressful.

It's easy to argue from a chair.

...But yeah. The internet is littered with stories of academics who did just this, and how insanely hard it was for them. And the ones who write articles in major newspapers are the ones who sucessfully transitioned.

they can flee to a country that still cares about climate science and continue working on important research

Research funding doesn't just pop up that quickly.

The US isn’t going to produce anything worthwhile in that field for at least two more years

The currently employed climate scientists would disagree.

the only studies they’ll fund are ones that say coal, oil and natural gas are good for the environment

They're still funding climate studies. Republicans are still trying to gut them.

Maybe. Do they consider the administration’s position a personal attack? Then yes.

It seems to me that any employee could fall under this logic given that every CEO has a interest in automating away their entire work force.

I didn’t know that CEOs could draft executive orders

A CEO can draft discriminatory policies which take immediate effect and it's up to employees to ask a judge to stop them.

Quite the capitalist approach, when a CIA can just assassinate CEOs and classify their actions.

A CEO could also pay for assassinations and classify their actions

Cuz leaving the CIA when you're being actively targeted is a smart idea /s

Then why was the CIA targeting “buggers”?

Loomer, hm?

My polygot ass couldn't even dare approach a Karen.
Why do Americentrists even assume I am scathing yapper, when I specifically choose the Canadian instance to 🔁?

Amekunts this illiterate?

Eh, she had been doing that job for decades, and didn't agree with Trump politically. Someone else voted for the leopards who ate her face.

It's the CIA, do you think CIA only holds good secrets?

You mfs went berserk when all the shit about CIA came out and then called whistleblowers terrorists and what not, but didn't aim to fix a single fucking thing.

Yet you still think the people who work for them should get the benefit of the double and think they don't agree with the administration they work with?

If she didn't agree with Trump there would be a treasure trove of leaks and whistleblowing going through this bullshit.

Right. The «Where’s the #EpsteinFiles» want me to sympathize the PedoCabal‽

Goodness gracious, Mrs. Curlee, I better see ALL THE UNREDACTED FILES in threadiverse’s command station by tomorrow morning 0700 sharp, on the double!

Hey, what job was that again?

Has the CIA historically been anti-trans? That's the only way this makes halfway sense as a leopard eating face situation.

You may dislike her for working for the CIA, and you may think she deserved it. But I don't see this fitting the theme.

she watched the agency dismantle its LGBTQ+ employee organization, remove Pride flags, and impose the administration’s restrictions on transgender workers. Earlier this year, she finally left the career she had once expected to hold for life.

Anti-Trans because Laura Loomer had Trump's ear for a second. Probably told him there is a secret trans conspiracy deep state.

She didn’t deserve it merely for existing. From my perspective, she deserved it for her asinine, inexplicable decision to continue serving an administration that clearly didn’t respect people like her. She continued to serve an administration that had become an enemy.

She could have just walked away, but instead walked across the street to piss at Starbucks, then walked right back.

She was only two years away from a retirement pension when trump took office the second time.

Walking away from a career is not as easy as you're making it out to be. You think her work experience would apply to literally any civilian job outside of government contracting?

One thing about government employees is that they learn to ride out the waves when the political leanings of the administration switch back and forth. They learn to detach their personal beliefs and opinions from whoever is in office, because their job isn't supposed to be political.

This administration is an anomaly in that regard. But many careerists stayed under the belief that if they could keep the government working long enough, a new administration would come in and fix whatever this one breaks. They probably trusted in checks and balances to prevent things from getting this out of hand.

But yeah, two years away from a retirement pension, and then have to leave and go be a barista somewhere? In this economy?

Am I supposed to feel sorry for her because she decided to keep working for a fascist? She gambled the freedom of others on her pension. Fuck that.

Whoever your boss his, he's probably a fascist too. I've heard more than one leftist say there's no ethical employment under capitalism, that people just have to survive how they can. It's how they justify to themselves the fact that their whole lives are spent working to make oligarchs richer.

But obviously it doesn't apply when it's someone else doing it. No, can't have that can we?

They learn to detach their personal beliefs and opinions from whoever is in office, because their job isn’t supposed to be political.

Quite the peculiar dissonance here. Are most Amekkkunts this dissonant on what politics they praxis‽

It's not really that dissonant. If every government employee turned over every time a new president gets elected, we wouldn't have any public servants. Only sycophants and lackeys. A big issue with the current administration is that he fired most of the careerists and replaced them with his loyalists.

Non-political government workers are necessary in a healthy democracy. The only reason it's a problem in this case is because the democracy is not healthy right now.

If every government employee turned over every time a new president gets elected, we wouldn’t have any public servants. Only sycophants and lackeys. A big issue with the current administration is that he fired most of the careerists and replaced them with his loyalists.

I see my error. <img src="https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/6dedb145-206a-4b35-ab5e-c9e41e1130c7.png" alt="Amerikkka" width="16" height="auto"> doesn't even teach political sciences and theory for you to dissonance militant intelligence officers (spies) to actual servants that face the public, answer to the public’s summons, and hold their deeds accountable to public scrutiny. If they did teach Political Science 101, you would already know sycophants and lackeys is what the <img src="https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/6dedb145-206a-4b35-ab5e-c9e41e1130c7.png" alt="Amerikkka" width="16" height="auto"> has always depended on to genocide the indigenous and the “Negros.” Every president, since even Georgey himself, fired officials for treason and consulting with the enemy since soldiers would not prove useful. It was soo bad, your Republic was about to fail in less than decade. Your country needs loyalists, otherwise it's not a government you have, but a commune.

Non-political government workers are necessary in a healthy democracy

Reread your contradiction here, twice.

democracy is not healthy right now

Mob rulings are not healthy either in any true liberal society. But you never had either. You had rich white men convincing poor white men they were better than the savages, better than the slaves. You have a plutocracy, and it never ceased being one. Your ballots only serve to distract the population on which boot to shine. Not that the boot will ever leave the public’s face.

Yes.

You may dislike her for working for the CIA, and you may think she deserved it. But I don’t see this fitting the theme.

What do you earnestly believe the CIA does‽

I can't believe you even had to ask that.

This is not leopards eat my face material. Her job was to summarize intelligence for any elected official.

for any elected official

Let’s set some honest good faith arguments:

  • Who exactly does she answer to?
  • What intelligence did she gather?
  • For what purpose is that intelligence gathered?

Does doing illegal espionage for a singular official person count as “summary” for any office?

  • The executive branch
  • Intelligence from every spy & spy satellite presumably.
  • To keep the president informed

Does doing illegal espionage for a singular official person count as “summary” for any office?

Yes. A decision has to be made with the best available information.

A decision a President, not Congress, not the Supreme Justices, or the public makes.
This is why she is by academic definition, a private spy. Not a public one.

Now that as a spy, she has been publicly burned, I hope she can continue sabotaging her public.

Congress passed a Law creating the CIA. The CIA is supervised by all three branches.

The decision is made by an elected president.

As a CIA spy she worked for the public.

The CIA is supervised by all three branches.

Final warning, disengage.

What is your link supposed to prove? That they used one of the many exemptions built into the FOIA law on purpose?

I respectfully disagree.

The job changed on her, as jobs occasionally do. It became summarizing intelligence for an elected official who only recognized two sexes. She decided to stay regardless. The message of hateful intolerance was written on the wall as clearly as possible. Her choice to ignore that reality is how she got her face eaten.

The job changed on her to Trump 1, then again to Biden, then again to Trump 2.

And she stayed because elected leaders need intelligence gathered from their own sources so they can make the best decision for their people.

Leopards Eat My Face is situations when people actually want the Leopard.

Leopards Eat My Face is situations when people actually want the Leopard.

That’s a good point. Wanting to stay and appease the Leopard seems close enough in this case, though.

Wanting to stay and appease the Leopard seems close enough in this case, though.

Would you add every other federal employee who lost their job?

If they lost it because of an obvious discriminatory policy against them, but they chose to ignore reality and remain a good little worker bee anyway, then yes.

That seems like appeasement to the asshole who want's them gone.

That not appesment, that you chossing to move on and away from a country that clearly doesn't value you considering they let him in their in the first place.

The asshole would be happy whether the employee quits or gets fired. It’s unavoidable. I’m more concerned with the wellbeing of the employee than the asshole, and hope the employee chooses to leave on their own terms.

Leopards would never eat MY face, said the woman who briefed face eating leopards

Every time I hear about something like this I get the feeling that it’s actually because that person is ethical and wouldn’t sell their secrets to the highest bidder rather than being about the thing they say.

I hate how the intelligence “community” is already defending her selling secrets to The White House, because foreigners also do not deserve their secrets stay secret. Cry me a river, your job was snitching to leopards where prey is at!

midwest.social

Rules

  1. No porn.
  2. No bigotry, hate speech.
  3. No ads / spamming.
  4. No conspiracies / QAnon / antivaxx sentiment
  5. No zionists
  6. No fascists

Chat Room

Matrix chat room: https://matrix.to/#/#midwestsociallemmy:matrix.org

Communities

Communities from our friends:

Donations

LiberaPay link: https://liberapay.com/seahorse