I believe it’s been a societal shift from taking nudity in adult situations and putting them on your phones at home for everybody. Now it’s more of a private, intimate thing that people don’t want to see when they’re in a shared experience. Whenever people now see nudity or very adult situations in a big theater, they get uncomfortable.

People are not having enough sex. That's why they are conflating sex in a movie with watching pornography and feeling embarrassed or shameful about it when other people are around (e.g. in a cinema). They have become conditioned by too much wanking in solitude and are in desperate need of real sex in the real world to dispel their misconceptions and hang-ups.

How are we gonna get a worldwide audience to have more sex though?

he hates fun

The nudity isn't the problem. It's the long protracted fakest looking sex scenes.

His name made this title impossible to read. I spent too long trying to figure out what gluck cutting meant.

What's wrong with gluck? It's a perfectly cromulent word.

Seriously, it's like nobody even tries to embiggen their vocabulary anymore

I think everyone in this thread is high. And I'm right there with you.

If only we had some way to write proper nouns in a way that clearly distinguishes them from other words.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden-path_sentence

Is it a garden path sentence or a crash blossom?

Didn’t understand the title until this comment. Thanks

I came to the comments hoping someone else had mentioned this.

Wait, it isn't slang?

Well glucking is a sound some people make when giving real nasty sloppy toppy so I thought it may have had something to do with that but variety is normally not that crass.

"People are upset with all the nudity in this BJ porno!" now that'd be a story. ha

Felt cute, Will Gluck later.

-Hawk Tuah

He’s not wrong. You can depict sex in a movie without it being explicit.

Yes there are stories where sex is the point and explicitness makes sense but for most stories it doesn’t, a kiss, a back shot of a removed top and a fade to black is all we need. They boned. Fabulous. Let’s get on with the plot.

Fuck the plot. The plot is just a framework to hang the parts of the movie I actually care about on. Give me texture. Give me emotion. If there’s a big moment between two characters, let’s sit with it a minute. Make me feel something.

Not saying every movie needs a sex scene, but they shouldn’t need to be excused or justified. The idea that adult viewers are getting squeamish about this is disturbing to me.

If you want to watch porn, you know where to find it. There's no reason why people who sit down to watch a movie should be surprised to find out one of its scenes is literally porn.

If you need to use nudity to make your audience feel something, then you're a shit director and need to quit your job and transfer to the porn industry.

And if you require nudity in order to feel emotion then you're probably a porn addict and should get therapy.

I feel like you had your way for a while. Seemingly every movie targeted at vaguely adult audiences needed to have a sex scene in it. For some it was fitting (Anora is the last one that comes to mind), but for the vast majority it just felt so forced. You could almost see that everyone involved in making the movie, from actors to camera operators to the director, didn't really want a sex scene and just had to add it because it would boost movie ticket sales (or more likely blu-ray sales, hopefully people wouldn't be wackin' it in the theaters). Some of those scenes were so out-of-tune and out-of-pallet from the rest of the movie, it completely shattered the suspension of disbelief, reminding me that it is really just a bunch of scenes spliced together rather than a believable story or a self-contained experience.

In this case, since it's literally a movie about fucking, a few explicit sex scenes are in order. But overall I think it's good, at least for the art of moviemaking, that the pendulum is swinging the other way.

Sure they do. Seeing 2 people nude up and simulate motion isn't texture, it's carnal gratification no different than porn. You can dress it up as art or meaning or whatever that makes you ignore the fact that you want to see sex.

You know how I know I'm right? Where are the sex scenes with ugly and fat people in them?

There are plenty of things that are just in movies for the spectacle and excitement. Explosions, car chases. Surely we shouldn't ban all of them.

Like, I get where people who don't want to see sex scenes are coming from, but this is a movie literally about sex. There are plenty of Disney movies you can watch, let me have some sexiness here!

I'm looking forward to the not directors cut.

Gooners cut

Cinemas should run a drink and tissue box combo for it.

I worked at a 18+ cinema (served alcohol. Not that kind.) and 50 shades of gray came out (I'm dating myself hard here...)

Anyways we had this giant group of 40-60 year old women who came in and started having vibrator duels like they were lightsabers. Weirdest fucking thing I've ever seen and they almost got tresspassed for it.

Puritans should just stop making movies

and stop being in test audiences for movies literally about sex.

Kinda makes you wonder what the whole point of the movie was, then.

That's like if the John Wick movies cut out all the violence and shooting.

So the dog is still alive? Gotta update its doesthedogdie.com entry.

For me I think it’s just consistency. They should match the main cast’s intent. If there’s a lot of nudity, but not the main cast, it takes me out because it’s clear they were not paid enough ir not on board. I even watched a cartoon that had nudity in it, but the main cast was not nude, and that’s a cartoon. Or when halfway through a show the nudity disappears and then it’s very apparent the actors feel big enough to not do it anymore.

As we started to show it to audiences, we felt it takes you out of the movie. You’re engaged in the characters and what’s going on, and then you pan over and there’s two naked people having sex, and you watch the audience … it’s a physical thing. They turn to who they’re with and … the benefits do not nearly outweigh the negatives of it. So we just kept editing it out until we got a balance, and those comments went away.

So the test audiences enjoyed the movie about sex, but only if you couldn't see the sex. Sounds like terrible test audiences.

Perfect test audience for Skinemax style softcore porn. It's porn, but without the good parts.

I noticed I do tend to skip all sex scenes...

Put it back.

“You know how the acronym for word-of-mouth is WOM? I’m calling it a WOM-com.”

WOM???

midwest.social

Rules

  1. No porn.
  2. No bigotry, hate speech.
  3. No ads / spamming.
  4. No conspiracies / QAnon / antivaxx sentiment
  5. No zionists
  6. No fascists

Chat Room

Matrix chat room: https://matrix.to/#/#midwestsociallemmy:matrix.org

Communities

Communities from our friends:

Donations

LiberaPay link: https://liberapay.com/seahorse