People TwitterWhy the fuck do people give that many fucks over how other people fuck? What does it matter?
Amen to this! Let people be, let people fuck what ever they want.
*In some sensible guardrails, let's exclude kids and maybe dead people, animals and such, you know. But as long as there's consent, I don't give a fuck.
Because they're also gay but can't accept it
Sometimes it's "reaction formation". They like a thing. That makes them uncomfortable. They instead go hard in the other direction - they hate the thing it's horrible and bad and the worst.
Sometimes they're just... basic, and need the world to fit into simple boxes. Anything else stresses their brain.
The ancient Greek hate when you feminize the little boys they rape, everyone knows this.
They made homosex woke. Enough said
They must be thinking about Hollywood’s depiction of exaggerated “manly” Spartan homosexuality. They just want to LARP 300 so bad, you guys.
Did they actually show any homosexuality in the movie 300?
No, ironically the Spartans in the movie made fun of the Athenians by calling them boy lovers. Which is hilarious considering that Spartan society was way more homosexual than Athenian society.
I always interpreted it as a Spartan preference for grown men over boys.
Like more Freddie Mercury and less Judy Garland, please.
Idk, maybe if there was even a single reference to Spartan homosexuality then maybe. But Spartans were just depicted as beautiful strong who all loved their beautiful strong wives.
The subtext speaks louder than the text in 300.
Lol, I think you might be giving it more credit than it deserves. I'm not sure if there is a lot of subtext in the movie 300. The writing in that movie is pretty minimal and straight forward. It's just a shoddy framework for some interesting (for the time) visual effects.
That is unless you think Zack Snyder was purposely creating media that would fascinate future chuds for years to come. Imo it's just the movie your average 14 year old boy would make in the 00s.
Subtext need not be intentional.
I couldn't really tell you, I was... distracted.
Hey now, the ancients were ped erasts, not ped ophiles. The fancy term makes it okay!
(Just don't point out that the difference is that pederasty means same-sex pedophilia. Or do! I wonder how they'd react.)
How is there another nuanced difference in terminology for sexual attraction to children (that I didn't know yet)
What's it called when a man loves a 600-year-old dragon in the body of an 8-year-old?
Eight-year-olds, dude.
Because that one is mainly used by historians, not pedos trying to move the goalposts so they can pretend they aren't one.
