If you are on a desktop, there is always the option of throwing a GT 1030 in the secondary pcie slot and jumping through the 100 hoops to get Looking Glass set up.

Windows can't fuck the bootloader if you lie about its HDD access.

"Linux supported hardware" is an outdated phrase only used in windows propaganda today.

Psht. I wish! This is wrong and will set people up for failure. There is absolutely hardware that will work well with Linux and hardware that will not.

I tend to run into problems with brand new laptops. Microphones don't work, web cams don't work, fingerprint readers don't work.

I have a Dell Dell Pro next to me with a web cam that doesn't work. Arch, btw.

I also have a Lenovo T14 where everything does work.

The point is you have to RESEARCH before you buy. Otherwise, you're gonna get mad a Linux for not supporting your hardware, instead of being mad at yourself for not researching first.

Hardware that's too old is problematic and hardware that's too new can be problematic.

Absolutely not.

Signed, owner of half-supported hardware.

What Linux kernel are you running which isn't supporting your hardware?

Out of curiosity what hardware are you using that's not supported?

Printers 🤣

In my experience, the only OS where printers won't have drivers is Windows.

But I don't deal often with dark demoniac systems, so there are probably lots of niche hellish devices that I don't know the details.

BS, I have gotten HP printers to work on Linux with no problems.

My Epson inkjet is a paperweight without w*ndows

I've got some LianLi case fans that aren't supported by anything Linux that I've been able to find. I run a barebones VM just to control their features.

There's still tons of devices where Linux doesn't work properly with them.

My Intel wireless cards cannot maintain a 6ghz wireless connection for shit despite some of them being over 5 years old. And Intel. Latest stuff, older kernels, none work well. Oddly whatever version of Fedora I had worked the best. My wifi wasn't unusable when 6ghz was an option. It only dropped to 5/2.4ghz once a minute instead of every 5-20 seconds.

My guess is that you are noticing the difference between new and old kernels

Sure, but that doesn't change that it's regressed since that one version and still hasn't been re fixed.

If the old (or LTS) version of the kernel doesn't support something newer, and the new version of the kernel does, that would not be a regression.

I learned this when Skylake first came out. Ubuntu LTS didn't work on it because it was an old kernel and this was new hardware. If you have new hardware, use a new kernel.

This Fedora version was a year+ ago. Even on 7.0 wifi is unusable on my machines if I have 6ghz enabled.

2 separate bootloader partitions. Grub launches the windows bootloader on a different partition so it isn't aware of anything other than itself. Then the 2nd bootloader actually launches windows. Don't try to share one partition or else windows will inevitably wind up clobbering the Linux loader.

Windows will know, its lik a cancer

My gaming PC dual boots Debian and Ubuntu

Kirk : I use a computer with an AI assistant and 1 gb of free ram. How about you?

Homer : I have a normal computer that lets me do what I want with my hardware.

Wonderful day!

It's apparently the third day (in a week!) I see people share their negative view on the booting being damaged by Windows...
Frankly, it's quite odd to see so many people having the issue when Windows or any other OS rewrites the bootloader...
It's sure possible to have it safe, so that even Windows won't rewrite during its update.

Though, I've been into Linux for more than 20 years now, I do have a machine that has Windows 10 installed alongside Linux, even if it's more frequent to boot Windows in a virtual machine nowadays.

The idea is to not share the location for the EFI files (in UEFI mode), but let the systems have their own keeping them fairly isolated, where Grub v2+ or another bootloader you prefer, load them all respectively, being located on a safer partition.

For example:

  1. We have two storages (e.g., SSD): /dev/sda and /dev/sdb.

  2. Install Windows on /dev/sdb (so it creates its own ESP);

  3. Install Linux on /dev/sda (so it creates its own ESP), with a normal/manual partitioning:
    - /boot/ (for Kernels I have 4 GiB+);
    - /boot/efi/ (commonly, from 128 to 512 MiB is enough);
    - Here I normally also have a swap partition, and separate: /home/, /var/;
    - Select Grub to be installed on the /dev/sda;

  4. Boot the Grub in /dev/sda;

  5. Update Grub within Linux, so it finds the Windows EFI on another drive via its os-prober.

Here, I believe efibootmgr should show the existing EFI, or you could check it manually in /boot/efi after.

Windows should operate on its own ESP it created on its own storage, and don't overwrite the Grub.

At voila!

To additionally clarify, in my personal experience for many years on Linux, I usually tend to see (and are fond of, personally) having separate mounts for contextually different data, where one of the most adequate in frequent circles and duties is to separate the responsibility as, for example:

  1. Main system (root) - /;
  2. Kernel (~4GiB) - /boot/;
  3. EFI (~128-512MiB) - /boot/efi/;
  4. User personal - /home/;
  5. Variable - /var/;
  6. Swap;
  7. (Optional) System configuration - /etc/;
  8. (Optional) Temporary - /tmp/;

It's also frequent to see the Logical Volume Manager (LVM) active, that may support a more fluent organization of hardware and logical devices. In this case, we might have all the above mounts, except 2 and 3, practically encrypted, too.

One of my current main machines have the following partitions (though no dual-boot on it):

sda                                             8:16   0 953.9G  0 disk
├─sda1                                          8:17   0   512M  0 part  /boot/efi
├─sda2                                          8:18   0     4G  0 part  /boot
├─sda3                                          8:19   0    32G  0 part  [SWAP]
└─sda4                                          8:20   0 917.4G  0 part
  └─luks-12341234-1234-1234-1234-123412341234 252:0    0 917.4G  0 crypt
    ├─vg_system-lv_var                        252:1    0   400G  0 lvm   /var
    ├─vg_system-lv_home                       252:2    0   400G  0 lvm   /home
    └─vg_system-lv_root                       252:3    0 117.4G  0 lvm   /

If interested, please check the following:
- file-hierarchy (File system hierarchy overview... - Linux manual page...)
- Encrypting an entire system;

On Windows, if I am not mistaken (please correct me if wrong), the most frequent is to have at least two explicit partitions, in addition to the implicit primary 4 ones:

  1. EFI Boot Partition we mentioned above;
  2. Recovery Partition;
  3. Microsoft Reserved;
  4. Primary Windows.

For example:

- C:\ - System and automatically organized User personal files (desktop, documents, variable as AppData/ProgramData);
- D:\ - Manually installed programs and manually organized User personal files;

You can include a separate data partition to enable easier maintenance for situations where either the primary operating system is likely to be replaced, or when multiple operating systems exist on the same device, such as Windows 10 and Windows 7. When a device has multiple hard drives, a data partition may be stored on another drive.

For typical single-drive configurations, it's best that you not use a separate data partition. There are two main reasons:

- The partition may not automatically protect data that is stored outside the user profile folders. For example, a guest user might have access to files in an unprotected data partition.
- If you change the default location of the user profile folders to any volume other than the system volume, you cannot service your image, and the computer may not apply updates or fixes to the installation.

Source (Hard drives and partitions - Windows Documentation...)

Oh! I would recommend KDE Partition Manger if you prefer GUI for partitioning.

It's likely worth to mention that KDE Partition Manger (project source) is likely one of the best out there I found (tried at least 11 a few years ago) for convenient GUI Luks2 and LVM support, if required.

Even if compared to some of the popular, where Gnome's, GParted, and QtParted resulted in either unsupported logic for Luks2 and LVM or did not complete the task successfully. These tools are still awesome for other tasks, I believe!

Though, perhaps likely as you I do prefer shell or TUI, being dived mostly in terminals/servers, and a script is always an option, of course. Not to mention that even with the GUI above, manual commands are normally eminent/imminent.

Related: https://wiki.t2linux.org/guides/windows#separate-the-efi-partition-after-linux-is-installed

I think that's why peeps install stuff like gnu/linux and then slap Nvidia & Steam on them for lolz, they often can't live without pretending they are a wizard or a soldier in some novel machine generated propitiatary hallucinations from an app store no matter the cost, Gabe needs better yachts.

midwest.social

Rules

  1. No porn.
  2. No bigotry, hate speech.
  3. No ads / spamming.
  4. No conspiracies / QAnon / antivaxx sentiment
  5. No zionists
  6. No fascists

Chat Room

Matrix chat room: https://matrix.to/#/#midwestsociallemmy:matrix.org

Communities

Communities from our friends:

Donations

LiberaPay link: https://liberapay.com/seahorse