Being a woman
(midwest.social)
The Picard Maneuver
People TwitterThis is missing a few regular Get pregnants before the end one.
I got a hysterectomy last summer and now people don't ask me about kids much anymore. People who don't know me well think that I am upset over losing my ability to reproduce. The people I know well know that I had a small party after I got rid of my reproductive organs. I had a custom cake made and everything.
10/10 best medical decisions I've ever made for myself
My wife had a hysterectomy due to extreme endometriosis a few years ago. We had a Yeeterus party. Our friend made a uterus shaped piñata to bash.
I hesitate to ask what prizes were inside the piñata.
Cream pies
Just regular candy...
Missed a chance
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jelly_Babies
Swedish fish
I’d do a search for reproductive organ candy, but I really don’t need that in my history. Or my eyeballs.
I'm not sure if a king cake would have been appropriate here. Fortunately they're shitty cakes in addition to being a dental hazard.
Someone asked us if we're planning kids at some party recently and some other friend quickly said "you shouldn't ask questions like that, it's rude. you don't know what people could be going through". The other person simply said "you're right" and moved on.
People are slowly learning.
Asking people if they're planning to have kids is like asking an unemployed person if they've found a job yet.
I'm sure it must be great not having to deal with your body beating itself up for not getting pregnant that month. It might be invasive and feel free not to answer but im curious, have you noticed any other improvements or issues since then?
How irresponsible, having a baby when you can’t provide for it and don’t have stable housing. How dare you?
How irresponsible, trying to improve your income and achieve stable housing instead of having a baby. How dare you?
Women are criticized no matter what decisions they make. This is a way that patriarchy reinforces itself.
Edit: relevant essay: https://www.sevanoland.com/uploads/1/1/8/0/118081022/there_is_no_unmarked_woman.pdf
It’s exhausting.
Yup. This is why I can’t tell if I’m trans or if I just want to be unmarked.
This really hits.
Like, ok, my OS didn't ship with gender.exe, that's an aftermarket DLC consisting of 95% cosmetic skins, and I'm busy trying to roll out kernel patches. Sorry about that! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I only run it to avoid social issues and/or because it's the path of least resistance. And even then... I've only ever thought "I am doing A, B, & C, and avoiding X, Y & Z because they expect me to and it's just easier".
I know I don't want to change my gender -- there's not much there to speak of in the first place. I simply want to do what I like. On the other hand, I know that this is "not normal" because most other guys seem way more attached to their gender, like it's an existential threat to them if I cross an imaginary line while existing next to them. And they act compelled to know "what" other people are, as if they'll implode because they won't know how to be around them!
So the best thing for me to do is to get around people who care about other people LARPing at gender just as much as I do.
(To be clear, I have absolutely no problems with anyone else wearing the gender layers of their choice, and wearing them proudly. As long as they're not an asshole. I actually kinda envy this, because for me it's like wearing a parka in a hot car. Changing its color won't do anything, I actually just don't even want it, I want to live my life without carrying around these heavy rulesets for what color my shoes need to be. LMAO, hope you can find it in yourself to forgive me! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯)
Have you heard of maverique? That might be you. https://nonbinary.wiki/wiki/Maverique
I learned something new today! Thank you for linking this!
No prob. I did a bunch of flags for pride month, so I only just learned it, too.
Yeah, I feel similarly. I would very much just like to be seen as a robot/friendly ungendered alien by society. I’m happy wearing super gendered lingerie when I feel it’s called for, but that’s private. I’m also happy wearing a binder at home, but don’t want to wear one in public.
Unfortunately, the least gendered choice is sometimes the most marked. Like, I would have had to answer a question about it every time someone saw a wedding photo of me if I’d worn a suit, so I wore a dress. I didn’t care much, and it was so much easier to just go along with expectations.
From what you described, it sounds like you may be agender, ie don't have a gender. Not that you have to use a label or anything, but if you want to explore it further, it might help too know what to look up ;)
I suspect there's pressure from peer women too. Are there any non-partriarchal societies to check for it?
I don't know of nonpatriarchal societies, but there have always been women who enforce patriarchy. Consider, for example, "tradwife" influencers. Or look at the moms who let their sons get away with murder with a "boys will be boys" while reprimanding their daughters for not being responsible.
The Jewish culture is semi-matriarchal
https://youtu.be/_OczEtjzCQA
Documentary about Jewish women trying to divorce their husbands.
emphasis on the "semi"
there's still a lot of male privilege and overt male control
Do jewish matriarchs demand children from their daughters / daughters-in-law ?
The Internet doesn't give me a definite answer on that matter 😔
They absolutely do
Generally, yes. There is pressure from older generations regardless.
18-20 is the typical age for the most healthy children, and lowest maternal problems. At the same time, economic health doesn't peak until well into the 40s.
It makes for a social tug of war thats never easy to handle.
Well that is why the traditional family setup in many parts of the world used to be: marry young, have kids young, work your soul out while the grandparents raise the kids, repeat.
When society and biology don't align, we get a birthrate crisis.
Who could've ever predicted making it very hard financially to be young person and making it practically impossible to buy a house and start a family would mean people stop having families /s
Birth rates are plummeting across most of the world, including more equal places. I believe some of the poorest countries continue to have higher birth rates.
That's not to say there's no economic component, but it's clearly more complicated than that.
My parents had children they couldn't actually afford, so they spent most of their time at work instead of raising us. Somehow, they expect me to be grateful to them for not being there and for bringing me into slave world.
I wish I hadn't been born.
Same, but I went another way with it. I decided to have kids and be a better parent than them. Since my brother didn't have kids I was able to break the cycle and put better people into the world than my parents did.
If we don't try to put better and smart people out there then we are destined to fulfill Mike Judges prophecy.
I love kids, being a parent was the only "dream" I was really sure of when I was younger. But I can barely afford to support myself, and as a woman in my upper-30s I can see the door of opportunity closing rapidly.
Thankfully, not all is lost. Working in education means I get to do my part to "put better and smart people out there" without having my own kids. It still hurts that I can't have the life I wanted, but at least I have the ability to positively influence future generations.
Adoption can still be an option, maybe?
I don't think that their problem is not being able to reproduce, it's that they don't have enough money to afford life if they have children.
The "door of opportunity closing rapidly" in the upper thirties suggests she's worried she won't be able to afford kids before she'd have trouble with pregnancy.
Which, yeah, adoption or fostering could address part of that - but some people also want to experience the biological part of that process, and it sucks when they don't really get that choice
Idiocracy?
Edit: Idiocracy.
My parents had children they couldn’t actually afford, so they spent most of their time at work instead of raising us.
This is the reality for most people. I'm sorry they couldn't spend more time with you.
Yeah but imagine if we lived in a society where they could afford to have to and had time to raise you, that would've been pretty cool eh?
I prefer to focus on reality. Abuse has been normalized and things need to change. Others have it worse than I do. There are more victims every day.
Recently, when I went to the doctor, the nurse was going to take my blood pressure. I told the nurse it was going to be high, because the waiting room had a child having a meltdown, and a guy blasting what to me sounded like porn from his speaker.
The nurse zeroed in on the kid having a meltdown (not the kids fault at all, a five year old getting bloodwork done can be a nightmare, I know it) and this nurse started telling me anytime her kids acted up shed "pop them" right then and there and they behaved. Talked down on parents not doing this, and I just sat there in shock, and then defended the kid.
Another parent in my neighborhood said to me so casually, yeah I hit him (his special needs son) but I gave him a choice, the belt or my hand, he made his choice. DCF(CPS) is involved with the dude, and I am just shocked he's so open about beating his kid.
It's diabolical out there.
Yikes! It is frightening how shameless some people are; proud, even.
When I was young, I decided I probably shouldn't have kids. I figured that if my parents (who I loved and respected at the time) couldn't raise me without so much pain and fear, I'd probably do an even worse job.
When I told my abusive mother this as an adult, she told me I did not actually have that thought. How convenient for her.
We no longer speak. 🥲
What birth rate crisis? It’s only a crisis for capitalism, that wants to expand exponentially, which is unsustainable. For humanity, less people means less impact on the environment allowing the human race to live longer and healthier lives. It would benefit us all having less people on this planet.
Smart people stop having kids, let's make a movie about it!
(I know IQ isn't only genetic ofc.)
I mean I agree that we don't need to keep growing our population. What I'm referring to is the many people my age (Gen z) who cannot, and likely will not be able to raise families ever despite wanting to.
The rate of the demographic collapse in places like South Korea is also guaranteed to cause significant social issues, like too many old people, not enough people to take care of them sort of social issues.
Careful, someone might call you an ecofascist for acknowledging that obvious reality...
Yeah, a society that doesn't take into account biology can't possibly last. The hard discussion is that a lot of it is because we, as a modern society, expect certain things now: access to contraception is good, women having equal ability to enter college and employment is good.
But it's unavoidable that when an increasingly large share of the population are getting established in their careers in their late 20s or early 30s, the window of time to date, marry, and start a family is so much shorter than it used to be. Add in increased housing and living costs, and the window gets even smaller. Also, heaven forbid any step in the process takes longer than planned...
Yeah, a society that doesn’t take into account biology can’t possibly last.
It is also important to take it into account in a positive way. In the 'past' women were disqualified for certain jobs because they might get pregnant and that would require giving them leave and that would cost the capitalist machine profits!
Sometimes I wonder if women's lib was only successful because it happened to align with the capitalist desire to double the labor pool. Is that too cynical? Maybe we still would've gotten there otherwise.
It's irritating that you used to be able to run a 2.4 children household on a male breadwinner, and now two incomes is often not enough. We've normalised everyone working and noone able to focus on home and the family.
I guess the idea of the "stay at home dad" didn't take off enough to normalise a single worker after women were able to leave the house.
(I'm aware of the broad strokes hetronormative language here, but it's relevant)
I guess the idea of the “stay at home dad” didn’t take off enough to normalise a single worker after women were able to leave the house.
Part of that is women's wages didn't rise to match men's wages.
When society and biology don’t align, we get a birthrate crisis.
The birthrate "crisis" is also in large part due women's access to contraception and control over when they have children and how many.
Even in Nordic gay space communist countries where all the needs of mothers are provided by the state, there is a birth rate crisis (met with immigration).
I think many of us uncomfortable with the dawning reality that achieving the replacement rate of humanity requires oppression of women. Bearing children is an enormous pain in the ass and without pressuring and grooming women into it, we don't get to the maintenance target of 2.1 babies per woman.
There are probably ways societies could THEORETICALLY adjust to make child-bearing more emotionally attractive without social coercion, but, fuck, man, society can't even maintain platonic friendships these days, how are we going to figure out how to have every woman average 2.1 babies?
People need to give up on the idea that the replacement rate needs to be met all the time, everywhere.
It is ok, and natural for populations to decrease intermittently.
We have too many people. We can’t find affordable homes for the people we do have. We can’t meet the energy demands of the people today, without borrowing from the well-being of our planet’s future.
People are correctly looking around at the world and deciding they don’t need to be bringing more people into this world as it currently stands.
Our system is simply not set up for declining populations.
I'd like to think the declining birth rates are a natural correction, and that with fewer people, real estate will come down, and tuitition will drop, etc., but I think the problem isn't scare resources, it's wealth inequality.
And if we decided to move back into liveable cities, we'd have plenty of resources.
how are we going to figure out how to have every woman average 2.1 babies?
Taking away abortion rights and forcing women out of education and careers to stay home.
Well, that's how they're trying to do it in the US right now.
Yup. That's exactly the play.
I was hoping for a more liberal-minded solution, but it probably requires radically smaller communal living, more intergenerational. Even if everything's paid for, having two kids is a real sacrifice, but triply so if you're living alone and your grandparents are dead and your parents live an hour away.
Also check out Britt Hartley's video on Christian men. Religion is traditionally the place for women to have babies and be communal and shit but Christianity is so besotted with female oppression that the light is turning on in the minds of Christian women: Christian men are NOT safe partners.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTCMbGBnDh8
And you're absolutely right. The terrifying thing is that toopush women into having babies again--at least by force--you have to strip away 100 years of rights and close every avenue and loophole out to an independent life and an independent mind. Just banning abortion is not enough. You have to close schools, forbid employment, ban loans, etc.
Women, especially you majority-Trump-voting white women: take note.
It gets really frustrating seeing the conversations around falling birthrates. Everyone only wants to talk about the economy and social safety nets while ignoring the real driving cause - women's rights.
This is a manufactured crisis in order to control women.
I think the crisis is as real as any crisis we're currently ignoring. The left can use it to argue for their policies, and the right can use it to argue for theirs. Neither side is willing to let it go as long as it has political utility.
People have more babies when their economic needs are met.
Sure, but not enough. Would it be the worst thing in the world if people could continue the human race without working 120 hours a week? Nope! But it might not be enough to get 2.1.
It might not, but it might, but it also doesn't matter because the birth rate is only important to capitalism
And everyone that lives under capitalism?
When I refer to the crisis the real crisis part of the crisis is not people who don't want kids not having them, it's people who DO want kids not having them.
Our governments should absolutely do more to support families.
I don’t think the birth rate is ever going to go back to earlier rates because when given the choice, women have less children than before and they give birth to their first children later in life. Women should maintain access to these rights over their own bodies and lives.
Support families and women because it’s the right thing to do, not because it’ll make women have more babies.
[off topic]
Old science fiction novel. "Podkayne of Mars" by Robert Heinlein.
In the future Martian colonial women are encouraged to get married young and have a bunch of kids. The children are placed in cryogenic stasis until the parents can afford to raise them.
Heinlein always had a knack of finding core societal issues as well as the most deranged solutions to them.
You say that like it's a bad thing.
My personal favorite is from his 'Double Star.' It's never discussed in great detail, but the quick version is that voters get to choose what non-geographic community they live in.
Instead of picking your Member of Parliament based on your physical address, you can opt to be part of the community of 'Farmers' or 'Teachers' or 'Military Veterans' or 'Gamers' or 'Soccer Moms.'
My understanding was that the best time for women to have children was between 20-30 years old, not 18-20.
From what I've read, 20-30 is when women have most of their eggs at the best quality, and have the lowest health risk in pregnancy.
Where does the 18-20 come from? Like I guess you're most fertile at 20 but that's the only metric I can see thats best at 20. Hell, a lot of sources even say you have the best chance of natural conception in your late 20s.
It comes from men being attracted to teenagers and wanting to justify the attraction.
There’s at least one man in this very thread defending this. That men arent predatory to impregnate teenagers because that’s when women are most fertile/have the healthiest babies.
Ugh that's so fucking gross and literally not factual.
Any man interested in teens is 100% predatory and no amount of pseudoscience is gonna make up for the fact that
A) teens' bodies are not equipped to carry a baby without complications
B) teens are not mentally equipped to be parents
C) they only like teens because they're predators and teens are the only ones naive enough to fall for their shitty manipulation tactics.
teenagers
English isn't my first language nor am I from Western country, so a question: 18 and 19 are also teenagers?
Yes.
From thirteen to nineteen they are teenagers.
Yes, “eighteen” and “nineteen”
They're considered "teens" both linguistically and culturally?
Culturally they're in a transitory stage. Legally adults, but they're new to it and it's frowned upon to sexually pursue them if you're much older because they're new to adulthood
Yes. 18 year olds are technically adults in the US, but that doesn’t mean their bodies can support and birth babies as well as when they’re older.
that doesn’t mean their bodies can support and birth babies as well as when they’re older
I think they are restricted in that regard biologically way less than psychologically.
18-20 is not the "typical age for healthy children", it's in the oldest part of not being that and very youngest part of it. No one that young should have children anyway. Your, objectively wrong, view of this borders on very creepy.
In reality it's around 25-30, especially with a younger father since paternal age also matters. It's a pretty narrow window for the best possible outcomes for both the mother and child.
I’ve heard the argument that it’s sexist or predatory or whatever, and often people say that 18-20 is still too young physically and carries risks. But if what you’re saying is true, then it contradicts that
Mhm, pushing that teenagers have the healthiest children and lowest maternal problems helps foster beliefs like this- that men significantly older than teenagers are not sexist or predatory for impregnating them. This is a comment from this very conversation thread.
Pregnancies in teenagers carry additional risk. The healthiest age range for women to be birthing babies is a little higher than 18-20. More like 20-30.
Yeah, I’m not sure why this person has so many upvotes while being so easily demonstrably wrong.
It would be cool if we changed society just a little to help with this.
Not so much that it affects the rich though. That would be asking too much.
I mean, sure, we could make the world a better place, but like six very rich guys would be sad so we can't.
if woman didn’t date me for financial security they wouldn’t date me at all!
I meant more in the sense that we could tax the very rich and give everyone housing but Elon Musk wouldn't be a trillionaire anymore so we can't do that.
Problem is as fas as the rich are concerned, ANY change affects them.
Too young mentally as well. Which could be from society, but even in times where people were forced to be an adult early (working and having children), they did it from necessity and not because they were ready.
I have a cousin who had a baby at 14, back in like 2005.
Her life, uh, didnt turn out well.
The economy just plain doesn't work
Is that why in the past women would marry men 10-20 years older than them? Theoretically the man would be established in a career and have the financial security, and the woman would have the health and energy for childbearing.
I've heard the argument that it's sexist or predatory or whatever, and often people say that 18-20 is still too young physically and carries risks. But if what you're saying is true, then it contradicts that
In the past women were forced to marry whoever wanted to claim her, be it an old man of wealth, or whoever her father wanted to "give her away to".
I had a great uncle from PR who married my great aunt. My aunt died in her late 60's. He, a 70 year old man, remarried right after. He traded a peer of his, his old farm truck to marry his 34 year old mentally challanged daughter. This was in like, 2003. Blew my mind. She was nice, but didnt want to be there.
Women have faught for our rights. In the days of old, we were sold like livestock to the highest bidder. There wasnt choice.
I’ve heard the argument that it’s sexist or predatory or whatever, and often people say that 18-20 is still too young physically and carries risks. But if what you’re saying is true, then it contradicts that
It's not true.
Being a man is like:
Don't get her pregnant
Don't get her pregnant
Don't get her pregnant
Don't get her pregnant
Don't get her pregnant
Don't get her pregnant
Don't get her pregnant
Don't get her pregnant
Don't get her pregnant
QUICK GET HER PREGNANT!
GET HER PREGNANT NOOOOOW!
Don't get her pregnant
Don't get her pregnant
Don't get her pregnant
Don't get her pregnant
Dude sweet shes not pregnant
Dude sweet shes not pregnant
Dude sweet shes not pregnant
Lets try for a baby fuck my balls dont work
Lets try for a baby fuck my balls dont work
Lets try for a baby fuck my balls dont work
Oh sweet my balls work!
Dude sweet shes not pregnant
Dude sweet shes not pregnant
For men it's always "when are you getting a girlfriend" well, when I stop needing to do all sorts of shit for you and get some time for myself after work and after my own house chores MAYBE I'll have time to socialize BECAUSE THAT'S HOW YOU GET ONE
Ow, my balls
IMO, being a man is more like: "I can't get pregnant. nice."
"Yeah, but you can get her preg-VASECTOMYYYYYY!!!"
EDIT: wow guys, "to me" I guess you could replace "IMO" with "to me" as in "if I'm going to generalize my view pregnancy or whatever as a man, it's like this"
Idk if that's my opinion or experience. I didn't think that hard about it. It was more about the contrast between how much women have to think about VS how little I needed to think about it.
This reads like a woman's fantasy of a man.
IMO, being a man is more like: “I can’t get pregnant. nice.”
Most decent men can recognize when they have natural privilege, like the benefit of not having to grow and birth children with their own bodies.
In your opinion or in your experience?
You're right. The real victims here are men. It's so difficult for men to have control over their reproductive rights, to have access to contraception, being slut-shamed for getting pregnant out of wedlock, murdered at higher rates by their domestic partners when they're pregnant, having to go through birth and the risks associated with that, and then have to fear the higher risk of rape while they're in the hospital recovering from birth.
This seems like light trolling, but you're on the fence. Everyone here is trying to discuss things from my perspective. I understand your frustration, but try and keep it less sarcastic. This is a warning.
Fair enough and I'll heed it. Thanks!
np, it looks like you guys are figuring out a way to discuss with each other. Its kind of a master class (not sarcasm).
I dont think they were going on like that, just confused by the IMO, IMO.
I've run into this user before.
More than one person can be a real victim of something, why do you want to silence male voices?
Disagreeing with someone is not silencing their voice.
But the way you disagree, is. But you already know that, don't you?
It's ok, you lemmings can continue to send me DMs telling me all about how women shouldn't participate here and that I'm holding women back.
I'm not going to stop sharing my opinion that not everything needs to revolve around men and their feelings when we're talking about women.
You got all this from my question? Wow.
I was just wandering if that's @riqusimo experience because in my experience and from what I see vasectomy is not an easy fix (pun?) for men. Most of them are still expected to reproduce when time comes. More and more women never want kids but majority still does. Very few men will get a vasectomy before actually forming a family which is after the danger of causing unwanted pregnancy mostly passed. Even older men will be questioned about their motivation and doctors may simply refuse to perform it for younger men that don't have kids. Not to mention that in some countries vasectomy is simply illegal (Poland). On top of that we have decades of laughing at vasectomies in media and equating it with impotence. For some stupid reason many people still think being infertile means you're somehow less manly or something - another reason many men will thing about it twice.
So... not really as simple as riquisimo makes it sound. I wander what's his experience and why it's so different than mine.
But yeah, sorry for offending you with my question...
In my late 20's the urologist recommended I wait, as I was still pretty young. Ok, so I waited. 4-5 years later I went back and scheduled the appt, but then my primary care told me I should wait because I still wasn't married (though he had a med student training with him that day and she was supportive of my decision) At that point I really didn't care what he thought, I wanted to go along with it.
Ultimately, I postponed again because of a discussion I had with my partner. Who is the only other person who's say should have any influence on my opinion.
So yeah, there's resistance everywhere. Ultimately I took a little advice but was going to do what I wanted anyway. I don't care if movies make vasectomies look less manly. Movies make it seem like a manly endevour is to get laid. If you're getting a vasectomy it's because you're getting laid. Shaming it is dumb.
So that's my experience for whatever it's worth.
So yeah, there’s resistance everywhere. Ultimately I took a little advice but was going to do what I wanted anyway. I don’t care if movies make vasectomies look less manly. Movies make it seem like a manly endevour is to get laid. If you’re getting a vasectomy it’s because you’re getting laid. Shaming it is dumb.
Yeah, it's incredibly stupid but the idea is there. Many men will be worried about it...
So as I said, it's not as simple. By the time doctors accept you know what you're doing you are usually old enough to support family. Vasectomy doesn't protect 20 year olds from getting someone pregnant by accident.
Women are often refused permanent birth control until their husbands sign off on the procedure.
There's space to talk about the issues men face when it comes to reproduction and birth control. Taking over a post talking about women's bodies and pregnancy issues to complain that men have it as difficult as women will come off as insensitive and sealioning to some.
Taking over a post talking about women’s bodies and pregnancy issues
This is community about twitter, not about women's issues. I know you don't like it but we're still allowed to talk about our experiences here, regardless our gender. No one is "taking over" posts here. We're just talking.
to complain that men have it as difficult as women
No one said this, you're just making stuff up now. Taking about men's issues doesn't invalidate women's issues. I don't know what's the point of silencing men and dismissing their problems. It's not helping anyone.
will come off as insensitive and sealioning to some.
No idea what that is.
I said this post, not this community.
Couldn’t stand to allow a conversation about women without interjecting “wHaT aBoUt MeN?!”, could ya?
As I wrote this I knew velma will show up and say something like "don't talk about men under posts about women". I just didn't expect it to happen this fast 😂
Anyway, this is not WomensStuff, men are still allowed to comment here.
Anyway, this is not WomensStuff, men are still allowed to comment here.
And we're allowed to criticize you :)
And I don't mind it. You're doing important work here, keep it up :)
Your other comments expose your real opinions, but thanks anyway!
men are still allowed to comment here.
This is the future the left wants:
Oh i was looking for a different picture but couldn't find it 😞
if you have an image of painting of a mine with male sweaty workers and latex clad femme dommes with whips send it my way please
Why does it bother you so much? What are you so scared of that you have to silence male perspective?
Are women supposed to be scared when they disagree with men? Why do you think I'm scared?
Disagreeing with someone is not silencing their perspective.
Disagreeing with someone is not silencing their perspective.
Except you didn't disagree with me in any way. You just tried to silence me.
Technically I asked you a question.
Because you're extremely defensive which either means you're scared or you have an agenda. Given your second point, I now suspect you're here with intent to dissuade male perspectives from being expressed here.
"Disagreeing isn't silencing!" has some real "I'm just stating facts." energy.
Unasked for opinions from everywhere when you have the ability to grow and birth babies.
When people perceive you have the ability as well. Tons of women who can't give birth who get asked awkward and uncomfortable questions all the time.
Yup! My ex had this happen to her all the time especially from a church community we were part of. She would always say her doctor advised her not to have kids and if that didn’t work she’d go into detail about her body and why the doctor said she’d have problems carrying a child. Most would stop there but there were still some that would give her the “don’t you believe in miracles if you have faith?” type responses. We left the church after it kept happening.
I'm sorry she (and you) had to deal with that.
Being a woman is like - stop trying to tell me what to do. Keep your opinion to yourself. No one asked you.
Same for men although those ages differ and I guess it's, have a kid instead of get pregnant.
Being a woman is like:
Be female
Don't be male
