Brand New SentenceWhat fallout character looks like Harry Potter?
"Daniel"
punchlines make crappy titles
This is BrandNewSentence. The post headlines are always the sentence.
…What chicken nuggies take 20 minutes to cook?
to make them delicious, yes.
Also maybe you need less time if you're only making 4 in an air fryer, but us sane people make 8.
A lot of them do in the oven. They’re way better that way.
I think an air fryer has distorted my perception of cooking times, heh.
What, are you microwaving them?
In a way. I took my nuggies to Chernobyl.
The good thick ones, if you like them crispy.
Vegans: Why does no one like us?
Also Vegans: (Always "on" and going out of their way to insert themselves into situations so they can act exactly like that).
Yes I know not all vegans are like that but I also never see them telling the militant ones to STFU and stop making them al look bad.
It's as annoying as someone bragging about big ol' raw steaks and ribs and such, like they have been doing in the Texas political stuff lately. Both as a smear ("look at this pussy non-Texan!") and a defense ("I do love ribs, I really do!") and it all comes across the same way to me.
Truthfully, neither types of statements personally bother me, but given everything we know about the climate, economics, etc., the vegans are better and easier to defend.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do-gooder_derogation
It's your subconscious telling you they're right and trying to protect your ego.
a nonzero amount of this is literally astroturfing to make vegans look bad, if this makes you dislike vegans in general you're kinda just falling for meat industry propaganda.
I'm not a vegan but i don't eat red meat, so i guess this doesn't count as me telling militant """""vegans""""" to stfu, but whatever.
God, if only those people who want to save the planet shut the fuck up about it! How about you save the planet without annoying me??
Whilst I understand your argument, if a strategy isn't working, pursuing it becomes more of a personal identity thing than a commitment to an objective.
I do not disagree, but considering the meat-eating cultures, telling them to stop, has not exactly proved to be a winning move. The more working way seems to be, to get them reduce their meat consumption first. Then slowly convince them to take steps further... and even if that takes a long time, less meat is still eaten, so it is towards a better direction. Of course it would be better, if everyone would just stop eating meat right now. But that is still an idealistic take, sadly, especially with the meat industry having the lobbying money right now.
"Don't be mean to the meat eaters in case they might consider stopping someday" isn't a very effective strategy at getting people to think about what they're supporting though.
Neither is being mean, as it turns out.
Lol. What a childish take. How about, "Worry about yourself and your own problems. If it doesn't hurt you, you can't tell people what to do, and you shouldn't want to either. If they ask, that's one thing. But jumping on your soapbox every chance you get to preach the virtues of veganism is the same energy as religious zealots who try to recruit everyone they speak to. Nobody wants to be around that all the time. Don't be that person."
Keeping your head down, worrying only about your own problems is exactly what the Epstein class wants out of you. Don't ask, don't question, don't push, just lie down and take it.
"Don't advocate for others ever", got it.
Wouldn't it be more vegan-esque (?) to consume the chicken nugget and make use of it's sacrifice than to throw out an uncooked warm nugget?
buying chicken nuggets rather obliterates any vegan-icity to start with
It wasn't a sacrifice. The chicken didn't volunteer.
I think most sacrifices were not consensual.
