You have a lovely home
(midwest.social)
(midwest.social)
A real charmer here lol
Generally true though. Society robs us of all joy on purpose. Can't have shit as a man, because that looks kind of gay.
I'm getting all the stuff society does not want me to.
What robs us of joy is caring about other people’s expectations for us. We are free when we stop worrying about what people think.
username checks out
Tough shit. I'm getting all the "gay" shinny shit, and there is nothing you can legally do about it.
I'm getting so much useless vane shit, just to spite society.
Like a rug?
Ehem... there's a lot of places where they can legally do something about it... sadly. Agree on the sentiment, anyway.
seems like a dumb reason to do something, but... enjoy, I guess.
I mean, what if they really need a mommy to take care of them because they never had one, or if they had, she was a POS?
that's your fault. you should have made her a better mother when your were 3 years old instead of being selfish and depending on her, check your male privilege.
the problem comes from them expecting their partner to be their mommy and also fuck them
why is that a problem, and it not a problem for a lady to want me to be her daddy and also fuck her?
and i notice often, those are the same women who whine about men wanting them to be their mommy.
almost as if all/mostly projection, and anger at the opposite sex for not being fantasy fulfillment objects... and horror of horrors being human beings who are imperfect in almost every way.
Well they don't. They need therapy. Don't put that on women.
"Yeah I don't get it, I just don't get invited to anything anymore" - this person, on occasion, probably
Rage bait is rage bait.
i've had women come over to my place and do this. and then tell me it made them uncomfortable because men are not supposed to be able to cook, clean, let alone decorate.
An example of women perpetuating toxic masculinity
keep being you and i promise theres women out there to appreciate it
the women who appreciate it are not attracted to me sexually. or they are already married. i have had plenty of female friends who admire my home and my cooking. but i've never been in a sexual relationship with a lady who saw it as a positive, only as a threat.
the issue with dating that people really struggle to be honest about, is most of us have limited options in potential partners, and it's either accept what's available, or date nobody. i know exactly who would work for me to date, but sadly none of those women find me attractive, and the one who do find me attractive, are the ones who i have absolutely nothing in common with, and who think my lifestyle choices and values make me a closeted homosexual.
and yeah i'd rather be alone than be in another relationship with someone who constantly makes jokes about how i'm secretly gay and i'm going to leave her for a man, or what a pussy I am for being human and being upset over events like the death of my parents. but that's the type of woman who finds me attractive and wants to date me.
I don’t even mind being mommy but my kids listen to me and no man ever has. I’ll be mommy but you have to be a good boy or I’m out
I cannot imagine anyone jumping to that conclusion, this has to be a joke. Like, when I first saw the house of my now husband, the front door opened to a big empty room and my first words were "oh, this is wonderful, it's so empty it looks like a ballroom, you could have a big party here!'. Like, sure, he cannot decorate and defers to me on home renovations now because he always likes what I design (I design, he has veto power) but how is that dysfunctional? He was just fine with the open space, it worked and a house is for the people who live there. And a big empty space is such a flex in a way, like look - I have more house than I need. Guys aren't waiting around hoping someone comes and fills that up, they are enjoying the space, right?
If someone compliments your home, I just can't see getting mad about it.
no it's legit. i'm male and i've had women do this to me when they come over to my place. more than once.
a lot of people have awful expectations/low opinions of the other sex and get super angry at you if you don't live up to their low expectations of them
you think the home thing is bad? try being a dude who is emotionally open and honest. every lady says she wants that, but the vast majority of them are totally repulsed by it. i even had a couple of girlfriends who were so convinced men are all therapy needing emotionally student idiots, that when i was try to communicate they would just ignore everything i said and then tell me how i really felt. because my words didn't register as legitimate to them, they were women, and they knew the truth about how all men can't really properly express their feelings and clearly what I was doing was fake/false/wrong or something. it was utterly insane.
people are really really really wedded to their beliefs about gender roles and gender behaviors, to the point of total delusion that when someone doesn't live up to their sexist expectations, they just reject the evidence in front of their face and make up a fake story to maintain the preexisting belief.
tl;dr: all men are emotional student idiots. if there is a man who isn't, he's not really a man, he's secretly gay. because gay men aren't men either, or something? i dunno.
I purposefully keep my spaces open because I like the feeling. I like not having every inch of my house not need something in it.
I like to think of it like goldfish. A goldfish will grow to be the size of the tank you put it in, and that's good for a goldfish, but I don't want to be a goldfish - I don't need to jam stuff into every corner of the house just because a corner happens to be kind of empty.
cool. I find people who live that way to be really offputting and their spaces off putting. it feels like they live in a hotel. it's creepy af.
i like people who have stuff and their home looks like people actually live there instead of it being staged for sale.
Technically that's not good for the goldfish 🥴 they grow to the size of smaller tanks then it stresses their bodies to not be able to keep going to their natural size. I'd have to look it up what the recommended tank size is but hope folks look it up before getting one!
Someone who jumped to this conclusion was probably looking for a conclusion to their preconceived theory.
That or they are making a joke to dunk on people who do that
Art on the wall? Rugs? I'm from Eastern Europe, best I can do is rugs on the wall
Rugs on the wall, art on the floor?
Now just cover some shelving with curtains and you've got yourself an episode of Decorating Cents.
Wall rugs are art
They can really tie a room together.
I'm Kurt Wenner, best I can do is paintings on the floor
Maybe the dude was just... you know.
Poor.
Came from an environment that was usually a mess, chaotic, disordered, and he was genuienly impressed by how simple things, in order, can give a significant sense of safety and stability.
Maybe he'd never seen that before, maybe he had no model of a tidy and peaceful living space.
The same scenario could happen with anyone, of any sex or gender.
Man, broad societal levels of narcissism are just off the fucking charts these days... its the literal opposite of solidarity, of empathy.
if he was poor then he's an asshole for having been poor.
people don't have empathy for people who are poor. just malice.
I live an upper middle class lifestyle in my 40s. i haven't been poor for 20+ years, and yet for some people, it's considered something you can never live down, it's an original sin from which you can't ever be washed clean. you would be amazed at how openly hostile and violent people are towards those who are not as economically fortune as they are. rich and privileged people do not regard the poor and middle-class as human beings.
Or maybe he was just being nice? I can't imagine being invited to friend's new house and not giving compliments unless im like worried about them moving into an unsafe situation.
Sure, maybe he was being performatively praising when he didn't actually care that much at all about the home's decor itself, but wanted to affirm the resident's decor choice regardless.
Aka 'being nice'.
Maybe a million different possible things.
Why do you imagine its a new house, like the resident just moved there?
You could just... be going to someone's home for the first time. Maybe they've lived there for years, maybe they just moved in, who knows?
My point here is that there's a lot of additional context required for your interpretation. Your interpretation also manufactures and then ascribes an intent.
My interpretation only requires that men who were raised poor exist, and does not manufacture or ascribe an intent.
What a bunch of argumentative bullshit. Have fun being contrarian. 🙄
Its analysis, not an argument.
With which the author agrees.
Oh, you brought a shovel? That tracks.
Okay so maybe it wasn't a new home, but it was their first time seeing it. What difference does it make?
But no, you're right imagining someone's traumatic upbringing is a much smaller stretch.
Don't feed the trolls, neighbor. 🙏🏽
Growing up my house was always trashed. Parents with depression and full time jobs don't leave much time and energy for cleaning up, and there's only so much children without guidance can do.
So once I had my own defined space, it was basically minimalist to expedite cleaning. I didn't start getting more stuff, even clothes, until my partner moved in.
Me growing up, it wasn't quite that bad for myself, but some of my neighbors were from... way more fucked up families.
They had basically this exact same 'Wow.' moment, just... coming over, and seeing that... order was possible, things could be put basically back in place after use, etc.
They had no previous concept of it.
I remember going over to one of their houses once and literally stepping in dogshit, inside.
They just... forgot to let the dog out, I guess. Regularly enough that this was annoying but basically normal.
Depression is a bitch, and that makes you not want to clean. Then the grossness makes you more depressed.
Never ending loop.
I know.
I've been there.
I did eventually get better... but... it really really sucks.
Personally, I have no issue with people living with just the essentials, and although I can appreciate how other people decorate their flats, that would feel crowded to me very soon. Nothing wrong with being content with less.
it's subject. one persons essentials are anothers luxuries, etc.
it's also just weird. i have had women be impressed i had nice curtains, but then also angry i don't have a $5000 couch. or like, impressed how clean and organized my kitchen is, but then angry my closet isn't organized as well.
and my closet isn't organized because i'm not in there hours a week, i'm in there like 30 seconds a day.
Not being lame and pathetic means putting a rug and art in your house
what if you don't like art and you don't like rugs?
It's having the same stuff as everyone else, never being inspired by what others have in their home and never being impressed or letting it show.
I have both of this, multiple times even, but I wouldn't be so sure about the "not lame and pathetic" part tbh
Can't confirm. I do have rugs and art.
I keep seeing this content that’s “men are so stupid and inferior and awful” and it’s grating on me.
Like, yes, there’s definitely a strong toxic subset of men, but most of use are just… normal?
I’m in my mid 30s, when the women aren’t around we’re mostly talking about kids (those who have them), hockey, finances, house stuff, and weird health issues. Depending on the group, how stupid politics/government shit is lately.
I don’t know. It feels like the toxicity that came for incels is coming at women hard these last few years. Reddit really pushes this stuff lately.
I keep seeing this content that’s “men are so stupid and inferior and awful” and it’s grating on me.
That's because it's troll bait. Just like all generations have a bigger than wanted set of shitty people. I don't feel like I can take this shit down because it's not breaking any rules. You all can help by not falling for the bait though.
I appreciate you following the rules but tbh ragebait should be on of them. Lemmy is getting flooded with it lately. So many old, stupid social Twitter posts that do nothing but rile people up
This has 300+ upvotes right now though. I ethically agree with you, but I took over this community. If the community upvotes this sort of thing, I don't feel like I have the right to remove it because I think it's stupid and causes harm. I really want to, ha ha.
I know the opinion of one anonymous user doesn't carry a lot of weight but this would be my counterargument:
Upvotes are not a good gauge when people will upvoted anything that reinforces their beliefs. Even if it's straight up wrong like so many social media screenshots are.
Not all engagement is good engagement and more activity doesn't necessarily lead to a better community. Lemmy has been flooded with ragebait and say-nothing tweets lately and I fear it's becoming the norm
Definitely this. It circulates widely because it generates outrage, even though the number of people who actually believe this is miniscule. This is the same technique right-wing media uses
Agitprop, yep. One of the oldest tricks in the book, and we still need to remind people. 😶
It might even be the same people. I suspect that, but don't have any proof.
Russia has repeatedly and explicitly said they are playing both sides of the US/Western political divide against each other in online rate campaigns.
rage* 🙇🏼♂️
how important is proof and what would you do with it?
I have no idea how anyone could prove it. But if I could, I would remove these types of posts as spam.
you are being logical and thoughtful and acknowledging a complex reality.
the people who push this shit live in a black and white world where all men are scum and should aspire to not be men. these are also the same people who will complain there are no 'manly men' left.
they are gender supremacists living in a delusional reality of their own making. they simple hate men for existing, just men who hate women hate them for existing. except for when they are sexual fantasy objects.
I upvoted because the two panel underneath is mocking the ragebait post.
Not voting either way is also an option
OK
keep seeing this content that’s “men are so stupid and inferior and awful” and it’s grating on me.
Because there are groups specifically circulating ragebait to radicalize young and impressionable men into right winged radicalism. People see this all over the internet, but what do you see in real life? In my experience I have seen plenty of examples of casual misogyny in real life, I've never really seen any form of "misandry" in person.
I have seen misandry in person multiple times but not nearly as often as misogyny. The misandry had far less impact on anyone as well.
I will say i have zero appreciation for "nice" things and the house looking cozy or whatever. If it were up to me I would live in a bare apartment with everything painted white and minimal furniture. And there's nothing wrong with that and i have no reason to change.
Of all the things that are wrong with me and perhaps other men, this is just not one of them, it's just a style preference, there's zero morality involved. Whoever doesn't like it can just not fuck with me, just like i dont fuck with decorations.
People are talking to people in real life less and less these day. The people they do talk to tend to be of the same gender, this was a thing before the Internet but the Internet has made it worse. Combine that with algorithms where the first thing they learn about you is your gender and will feed you content accordingly, peoples view of the opposite gender becomes more and more distorted. So the terminally online people, that also make a lot of the content on the Internet, tend to become misogynist or misandrist.
they don't have to be terminally online. i overhear shit like this all the time irl. and encounter these attitudes all the time from women while dating in a liberal progressive city.
shitty people project their shit onto everyone. this is all this is. a shitty person mocking and deriding someone for being different than them or not living up to their bizarre and often hypocritical expectations of the opposite sex.
i go on so many dates where the woman basically just lays out what she is looking for in a relationship, and it's they often take this condescending tone where they think men are inferior beings that have to 'prove' themselves... instead of regarding you as a fellow human being.
Femcels are a thing. :\
I hate to use that term though because I love femcel communities here on fediverse. They probably got the best memes in the verse.
I still haven't figured put what the deal is with that place, and at this point I'm too afraid to ask.
Female celery
i just kinda showed up there and hoped no one would notice i'm married, but my wife is awesome i like to talk about her. and they're pretty cool on the community so 😘
It's really prevalent, but it's unfortunately hard to call out, especially irl.
I first read that as "horse stuff" and was wondering if horses were suddenly in now
The thing no one wants to admit or say is that while the modern (MeToo and onward) feminist movement certainly has good intentions, its been broadly co opted into a kind of pop-feminism that's about as actually feminist as tik tok psychology advice is real psychology.
Its morphed into basically just a semi-formalized worldview of mystic misandry.
'Manifesting', the Patriarchy as essentially an evil spiritual or god-like entity or force, which everything else is oriented around and against... while simultaneously claiming that adherents need to 'de-center men' ... near total abandonment of any attempt to empathize with the 'other', active glee in demonizing them... whole bunch of 'creators' just vying to be the most bombastic mini cult leader...
Its even got a discernible dialect.
They believe dogmas. When you try to inquire as to the basis or validity of those dogmas... they attack.
You get a bunch of faux psychoanalysis of how you could possibly have ended up so broken as to question their... you know, idea that they can't or won't actually defend.
Its like a religious fundamentalist launching into a semi-canned apologia response.
being critical of those ideas/movements means you hate women.
so does any suggestion that women's unhappiness in life is anything but her own. she is just helpless in a cruel world and she has no control over her fate... dare you suggest a woman ha agency over her own life and choices... you hate all women. but for men it's the opposite. men are entirely in control of their own life and everything that happened to them, is their fault. they need therapy, but also if they get therapy, they aren't real men.
and yes, a lot of it is full of cult/fundamentalist types of thought and belief.
so like, i went to this cult university. one of the smaller mistakes of my life to give you an idea. they had this feminists group there. i generally look white and male, and back then i went by this cool nickname that was about my disability (a different disability has coopted it and that makes me grumpy but you know what, we could share. it's not literally the only nickname what ever stuck to me besides my stage name. just, mine makes literal sense and theirs doesn't but whatever, i can't use it anymore anyways) and this group's leader decided that anyone who looked male was there to trawl for women to fuck and believe me no and doubly no not her. First that'd be an ethical violation, second i don't really need to say anything beyond that. Anyways, the motion to kick me out of the group was that because of my cool nickname based on my disability, and because i was white and male (even though i only look those things) i needed to go die in a fire.
now, this cult university does the weirdest psy-ops. like, there are articles in the salt lake tribune about them, don't take my word for it. i grew up outside the jello belt. my polycule of grandpas taught me real feminism, so something smelled really off about that group, whether it's just an absolute misandrist pseudo- firstwaver trying to deal with a punkrockabilly third/fourthwaver or it was a cult legitimately trying to turn people away from feminism with the subtlety of a brick.
i guess what i'm trying to say is, like, there's some real dipshits out there
Yep.
There are many kinds of feminism... and the pop-feminism of tik tok... yeah I agree, that's not real feminism...
But try explaining the entire complex history of feminism to somebody whose only seen the tik tok version of feminism.
They'll be very confused and think you are talking about something almost completely different, often to the point of concluding you are lying to them, trying to trick them.
As ever, everyone is talking past each other, trying to win an argument, not have an actual discussion.
God, this shit pisses me off so fucking much because it's this bullshit-ass pop-philosophy that liberals have settled into that pushes away young men and perpetuates the patriarchal bullshit in the world. "tHeY'rE jUsT pUnChInG uP" NOBODY SHOULD BE PUNCHING ANYBODY. The problem is the fucking system, not who is doing the punching. Libs get so wrapped up in anything but the system that they make the problem worse. Like the popularization of the term "mansplaining". Oh neat, so now the problem women face about being seen as competent is about men. Because, of course, feminism didn't come about to improve the treatment of women, but to point out who the bad people are. The would you rather for women about running across a bear or a random man is about how man worse than bear, not that women feel so egregiously unsafe in their daily lives. Libs are so far up their own ass, they'd rather create another fucking problem than actually engage in being part of the solution. Libs will see one problem and be like "but what if it could be two problem?" Libs see women get mistreated for no reason then go "men should suffer, too", then pat themselves on the back because now everyone hates everyone, no matter the gender[bullshit-ass heart emojis].
Fuck the patriarchy.
God, this shit pisses me off so fucking much because it's this bullshit-ass pop-philosophy that liberals have settled into that pushes away young men and perpetuates the patriarchal bullshit in the world.
To start with..... Have you ever even met anyone in real life that spoke this way? I feel like people on lemmy are so quick to see a post from an unknown random on the internet and speak about it as if it's an epidemic.
The problem is the fucking system, not who is doing the punching. Libs get so wrapped up in anything but the system that they make the problem worse. Like the popularization of the term "mansplaining". Oh neat, so now the problem women face about being seen as competent is about men.
I think the critique is aimed at a functional aspect of the system. You seem to acknowledge the patriarchy, which is a critique of a hierarchical system that is largely controlled by and benefits men. I don't see how agitating against mansplaining is anything but critical towards people talking over or diminishing the voices of women.
Because, of course, feminism didn't come about to improve the treatment of women, but to point out who the bad people are. The would you rather for women about running across a bear or a random man is about how man worse than bear, not that women feel so egregiously unsafe in their daily lives.
How do you change a system without being critical about aspects of the system that require change?
The man vs bear is definitely an allegory about how women feel unsafe due to the discrepancy of power between the sexes, in both physical and societal power.
Libs see women get mistreated for no reason then go "men should suffer, too", then pat themselves on the back because now everyone hates everyone, no matter the gender[bullshit-ass heart emojis].
I think the point is to highlight the discrepancy between the experiences of men and women. For example the man vs bear scenario isn't claiming that men too should be more afraid to run across a random woman than a bear. It's a way to highlight their perspective, the point is we should live in a society where women do not have to feel like they could become prey to unjust violence from a random man.
They have to play men and women against each other. Or else they would have to explain how systemic patriarchy manages to self-replicate despite worsening the lives of nearly all of the people (of all genders) who suffer under it. And the answer to that is: capitalism. Which is not an acceptable answer for the donor class.
You and I seem to have the same opinion about this.
Feminism has basically been co opted into a kind of psuedo liberal, privileged, socially acceptable because it calls itself feminism, form of misandry.
Like this OP image person would be the same person who would likely call a straight dude gay, as an insult, because he declined a second date with her.
Its wild because... like... these people are ostensibly 'liberal', they'll tell you they are, but they're actually not.
They believe in the concept of equal rights and opportunity, universally, for all... to the same the same extent that conservatives believe in Democracy or States Rights.
They don't actually believe in them.
They believe in them as rheotically useful dialects to speak about things from... but they don't actually believe in the actual principles.
Like we've gotten to the point in politics and society where everyone is so thoroughly full of shit, that we have an illiberal center, roughly, that then just pantomimes different flavors of rhetorical style... and then on the extreme ends you have people that actually believe in any principles beyond 'Im awesome and my team rocks'.
We are so fucking cooked lol, the owners have divided and conquered our minds extremely thoroughly.
Feminism has basically been co opted into a kind of psuedo liberal, privileged, socially acceptable because it calls itself feminism, form of misandry.
Has it? Or is this just what people opposed to actual feminism claim feminism is all about?
There is a feminist subgroup here on lemmy and it does not look anything like this post.
There are many people who call themselves feminists who fit the description I gave.
Lemmy is not the entire world.
If those people aren't real feminists to you, then you and I agree.
But the word has become multifarious and muddled, leading to mass confusion and needless hostility.
There are many people who call themselves feminists who fit the description I gave.
"Many people" who behave like this and call themselves feminist does not mean "Feminism has basically been co opted".
My point is that there are groups of political actors that either fabricate or boost the few examples of this type of behaviour to radicalize young and impressionable men into right winged behaviour/spaces.
But the word has become multifarious and muddled, leading to mass confusion and needless hostility.
So can making a post claiming that this is predominant behaviour, or that this is something that should redefine feminism.
Can you name a single famous or culturally significant misandrist that a non terminally online individual would know? Because I could name quite a few famous and culturally significant/powerful men who are actively misogynist on a daily basis.
No actually that is basically what co-opting is or means.
Who said this was 'predominant' behavior, of all feminists?
Not me.
Who claimed that the definition I gave was of what I consider real feminism?
I specifically set it apart, gave it a new conceptual descriptive name, as well as definition.
Nobody at any point said that misogyny is not a prevalent problem as well, with very prominent proponents.
I'm not gonna be talking to you anymore, because you're apparently not capable of engaging in this discussion in good faith, you're either consciously or unconsciously putting a crap ton of words into my mouth that I did not say.
nobody should be punching anybody
I cannot think of a joke - except for puns - that do not have a victim.
A newly wed couple is going on a 14-day cruise for their honeymoon. The husband pulls over on the way to the Port. "Why are you stopping?" asks the wife, "Oh I'm just picking up some condoms from this pharmacy - although we just got married we said we'd wait a year before starting a family?" "OK, but pick me up some dramamine too so I don't get seasick." So the husband goes to the pharmacist and asks for a 14 condoms and 14 dramamine tablets. The pharmacist says "If it makes you feel so sick, why do you keep doing it?"
Men in general / the husband is the victim of the punch line here. Or maybe pharmacists?
Much like dramatic narrative, from Shakespeare to Ted Lasso, all rising tension is resolved by a winner and loser.
I think you completely missed the point. "Nobody should be punching anybody" isn't about jokes, but discrimination. The answer to discrimination against women isn't to add discrimination against men. I'm pointing out that feminism is about liberation from discrimination rather than redirecting it to the "right group". The system should be the focus, not the people.
Also, it's not all victim this, winner that. It's not pie. Everyone can win, everyone can lose. Again, it's the system that's the problem, not the people.
I'm speaking dramaturgically. There's no literal Romeo and Juliet getting hurt, but in the story they both die.
That's what is meant by "punching."
Every rising action is met by a falling action. In a comedy format the tension rises to a punch line, where the punching happens, the fall is the release of laughter, and then resetting for the next joke.
I cannot think of a joke - except for puns - that do not have a victim.
You either don't hear enough jokes or you have a bad sense of humour. Either way this is just objectively wrong
it's not just jokes (again, excepting word play) - all narrative forms adhere to this. The concept of all stories is essentially based on conflict, where a platform is established, corrupted and reset.
"Punching down" means making jokes at the expense of vulnerable people. But all jokes have a punch line of some description- so it is impossible to be both a joke and have no resolution.
Some surreal humor relies on subverting this form somewhat, but the tension is usually released in other ways (i.e. a "straightman" or "fish out of water", commenting on it or else a structural change like cutting to a different scene)
There's no punching done in this joke, no winner or loser. It's just observational humor. The pharmacist draws a mistaken conclusion from his observation.
it's "winner" and "loser" not winner and loser.
If Cinderella, Cinderella is the loser to the step sisters, the winner to the prince's affection, the loser to time constraints, the winner to the final slipper fit.
It's a method of discussing rising and falling action in Aristotlean poetics w/r/t narrative mores.
Well it's a pretty inane method then
I mean it's how our brains are wired after roughly 10,000 years of oral storytelling tradition, and you can draw a direct line of storytelling methodology in most cultures back about 4000 years. These methods are what constructed the odyssey, the Iliad, the aeneid, the plays of Aesceleus, Euripedes, Sophecles, Aristophanes... all the way up to modern comic books, superhero movies and telenovellas.
Thanks! I’ve put a bit of work into the place lately
Pretty difficult to say, I know.
I've been over to places and complimented people on them, and they become hostile to you.
because in their warped mind, your compliment is an veiled attack on them. and they think you liking their rug is you telling them it isn't good enough or something.
this is typical of massively insecure people.
But then we wouldn't have rage bait for engagement.
Just remember that nothing online is real and this 45 year old Chinese/indian/russian/israeli man masquerading as a woman to induce social discord won’t be able to affect you!
What you percieve as reality is real, to you.
Its... this is the basic functional mechanism of propoganda, advertising, marketing, etc.
It does effect people.
No one is immune to propaganda.
That's like, the entire problem.
You might as well just say 'the internet doesn't exist, you've never seen a movie or a tv/netflix show, you've never seen an advertisement.'
That's about as absurd as what you are saying.
Also how do you know this isn't genuine?
How did you determine that?
Is... everything you don't like, a psyop?
It’s not that it’s not real. It’s that you, the person on the other side of the screen, and all that you offer aren’t worth observing or engaging with. This is a parasocial marketplace of ideas where I attempt to avoid being influenced or marketed to. It doesn’t always work, but demoting everyone here to the funny little neurodivergent technoanarchocommununists on my phone has helped.
To paraphrase, I barely skimmed because it’s inherently better for my mental health lmao
Well, the problem isn't that this is being manufactured, but rather exacerbating already existing problems. The Russian IRA didn't start racism in the US around 2013-2016. 4chan didn't found fascism in the west. North Korea didn't originate the very first crypto scams. You're absolutely right that the problems are blown way out of proportion and there are so many trolls out there, it's hard to tell if any one asshole is paid to be an asshole online or not. However, it's best to not over-correct and deny these problems exist at all, even with hyperbole.
I do, personally, feel it’s best to simply disregard online rhetoric entirely. It’s genuinely a perfect catch all for 90% of people. You spend more time with actual humans and you maintain a grounded perspective while chiseling those of others. I’ve lost nothing since turning everything besides Reuters into fiction. You carve your own space out of the people around you.
Which is to say, my vaguely meandering around your point is more cheeky than antagonistic.
this is tumblr level insufferable.
hence why it is getting upvoted so heavily, and commented on, and the comments getting tons of upvotes.
it's almost like... this is what we like. we love the insufferable.
Plot twist: the dude is an interior design elitist and was being sarcastic, and the poster cannot perceive sarcasm.
"Why is the birth rare dropping off?"
because of economic insecurity and the perception that having children is a huge economic liability rather than something joyful.
God forbid my place only has the bare essentials I need to live happy (big ass tv / PS5 / folding chair)
The sword really ties it all together 🥰
That chair has seen some shit
Too poor for the folding chair?
A chair that folds?! Too rich for my blood.
Any chair is a folding chair with enough motivation.
Needs something manly, like an assault rifle. That would really finish it off. Also has luxuries like a floor, what are you, gay?
Needs something manly, like an assault rifle.
I like the implication that the comically-oversized anime sword doesn't count.
The 30-something year old bachelor who has nothing in his apartment besides a tv, a PlayStation, a fridge full of beer and a mattress on the floor probably has a smaller carbon footprint than any of us
The real heroes usually go unsung 🥲
It's an apartment because living in a shed or under a tarp would be illegal. Damn government suppressing my rights!
Depends if he drives a car or not.
Not necessarily. A car by itself does not have a big carbon footprint at all, the problem with cars is that basically everyone has one, uses it for everything, and gets a new one every X years.
I drive a small car that I own since 2008, at that point it was already used, and it has 85000 km on it. If everyone of my age and up did that and drove so little, we'd have like 20-100 times less carbon footprint from cars.
It wouldn't even make sense for me to upgrade to an electric car. Yes, it'd use less and greener fuel, but the amount of carbon it'd cost to produce probably wouldn't "break even" until soooo many years in the future, maybe even after I die, at which point it'd even be a bad investment, carbon-wise.
So, like almost anything, it depends.
the problem is over consumption, yeah.
and the social environment in which it's encouraged, and less consumption is punished.
it always shocks me, as a small car drive, how hostile people are towards me for owning a car that just does it's job and has minimal costs and that I kept it for a long time. rather than the obsessive need so many people I meet who are buying a new car every few years and then whining about how much it costs.
Glad to see this format being refined I think it still has potential to develop some more
This site is going to shit with all these "feminism sucks" takes in the comments section ignoring reality and blaming nonsense like this for "causing the far right" feels like being on reddit and that's a bad thing.
The only person who said feminism sucks in this thread is you.
Where did I say that?
Can you elaborate on "ignoring reality"?
That patriarchy is still diffuse and dominant throughout society and that unfunny statements like this made by a handful of people is irrelevant to that.
The fact like people like the OP are so rare out in the wild or at least don't say unhinged shit like that out loud. What you're reading is 100% twitter-brain. Or a fed, they do this too because reactionaries basically do their work for them.
where do you live?
where i live the OP is pretty common. but I live and have lived in mostly elite privileged places, full of the trust fund wannabe boss babe feminist types. they are really out there, they just are concentrated in the most privileged and elite places.
and anecdotally, the vast majority of the angry feminist social media types i have known irl... were trust fund babies with daddy issues. their feminism and such is just classic over compensation for their real world dependency on men and male figures. I've never met a working-class or middle-class angry feminist... because they are too busy having to work and provide for themselves.
when i was in grad school we had a rad fem. she was engaged to a traditional, physically and verbally abusive guy and she'd been with him for 8 years. she was also, physically and verbally abusive to people, but you know it was 'just' in her eyes because she was 'fighting the patriarchy' meanwhile in her personal life, she was actively reinforcing it.
You won't find women like the OP living in Ypsilanti, MI, but you will find them living one town over in Ann Arbor.
I want to believe they're bots
The left: "We have absolutely no idea why young men are drifting to the right in droves. No clue. It must be that they are evil and want to preserve their male privilege! It couldn't be our own actions and how we treat them, no way!"
What the fuck does this have to do with "The Left"?
Some men will see one ragebait social media post and base their entire political worldview around it, then blame "the left" for anything that goes wrong in their lives.
Some people will see any critique of the left online and immediately go into defense mode. Hope this helps but I'd doubt it.
Mate it's not a "critique of the left" lmao it's a rant aimed at ragebait you fell for.
The issue is people being terminally online and exposed to too much ragebait more than it is anything actually political. Although social media algorithms being financially incentivized to feed you as much ragebait as possible and manosphere grifters making a career out of it is a very political issue.
Maybe he wants to be a pathetic little thing and needs a mommy to take care of him ><

Matrix chat room: https://matrix.to/#/#midwestsociallemmy:matrix.org
Communities from our friends:
LiberaPay link: https://liberapay.com/seahorse