Palantir fashposting on main
(xcancel.com)
(xcancel.com)
Yesterday, Palantir posted a Hitlerian screed tortured to be palatable to libs on their twitter account. Slop gold mine.
CW: ⚠️Extreme cognitohazard ahead⚠️
Key points include:
::: spoiler Full text of the tweet Because we get asked a lot.
The Technological Republic, in brief.
Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation.
We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible.
Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public.
The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software.
The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed.
National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost.
If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way.
Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive.
We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret.
The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed.
Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice.
The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin.
No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet.
American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war.
The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia.
We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn.
Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives.
The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within.
The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all.
The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim.
Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful.
We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what?
:::
Silver lining: This is the first twitter thread in a long time I have seen where the replies aren't primarily bootlicking and asking the fashposter to make out.
- National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost.
- The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia.
Hmm. Was it also an over-correction in 1920? Nothing bad happened when they were allowed to re-arm last time.
Maybe I'm dumb, but I find this manifesto really hard to follow. Outside a general fascistic vibe and how a people in positions of power should be less accountable, It doesn't feel very coherent.
Yeah it's like a shopping list more than a manifesto.
It doesn't describe a vision for the world they want to create, it doesn't stir or inspire, it's not written by a demagogue but a technocrat, it's a notes app ramble of patch changes they want to make to the status quo to lean into the brutality of empire.
Edit: this is the most LLM sounding comment I've written, im sorry
“our side is objectively correct! We are all geniuses, we know everything and can see through the bullshit unlike the idiot rubes of the other side!”
“What do I believe? That the rich fascists are infallible gods and we are to be their cattle! Dude, just TRUST them! Why are you so mistrustful of porky? It’s not like he’s a poor brown person!”
It’s hilarious how the average fascist will claim omniscience one day and then claim to be cattle for someone else the next.
It gives AI generated vibes. The incoherence seems to be a staple of LLMs
The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price.
THE DETECTOR IS MAXED OUT
lol Germany and Japan are going to be vassals of the burgerreich until the end of time. lol @ anybody who thinks the USA “defanged” Germany and Japan. the fangs are still there, they still yearn for untermensch blood, Japan is just Germany without the fake regret
Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful.
Indeed, let us wipe out the inferior ~~races~~ cultures!
I agree with him on this, tbh. American WASP culture has produced nothing but slavery and genocide. Meanwhile, Persian culture has given us the dankest memes since China started bullying people on Twitter.
What happens when STEM bros only see the humanities as just another requirement to get to the “real” subjects
I used the AI to ask if this is techno-fascism
Yes, the manifesto The Technological Republic by Alex Karp and Nicholas Zamiska contains themes widely interpreted as techno-fascist or leaning toward techno-authoritarianism.
Multiple analyses highlight the following elements that contribute to this perception:
Civilizational antagonism: The text frames global politics as an existential struggle between a virtuous "West" and a threatening "other," dismissing pluralism and coexistence as weaknesses.
Anti-democratic tendencies: It portrays democratic deliberation, restraint, and procedural oversight as liabilities in times of conflict, advocating instead for centralized, accelerated decision-making—often by technocratic elites.
Militarization of technology: The manifesto promotes AI and data systems as the foundation of "hard power," positioning companies like Palantir as essential to national survival through surveillance and warfare.
Privatized sovereignty: Critics note that Palantir’s deep integration with state security apparatuses effectively places life-and-death decisions in the hands of unelected, profit-driven corporate actors.
Ideological naturalization: The document presents its worldview as a technical necessity rather than a political choice, framing AI-driven deterrence and permanent conflict as inevitable—thereby foreclosing democratic debate.
As one critic notes, the manifesto functions as "a form of privatised sovereignty" and "a blueprint for the reconfiguration of power in late capitalism," echoing decisionist theories associated with Carl Schmitt—a philosopher influential in fascist ideology.
While Karp denies fascist intent, the fusion of ultra-nationalism, technological elitism, anti-pluralism, and the erosion of democratic accountability has led many observers to label the vision as techno-fascist in practice, if not in name.
It'd be great if Alex Karp fell into a woodchipper.
I hear there are newly rehabilitated rooms in an exotic mountain hotel open mini bar!
Love the mandatory
The United States is far from perfect.
disclaimer in the middle of this exhausting, incoherent word salad with nazi characteristics.
Tbh ran out of spoons to read it about halfway in.
It gets worse
This is what this pathetic creep looks like btw, just to put a face to this sephirothposting
Adam Friedland can easily dunk him.
How does the machine keep producing an endless line of Nazis in key high places?
The amount of cringe concentrated in this single xit exceeds the recommended yearly intake by approximately 5000%
Of course the fascist loves it.
emdashes
It's not x — it's y
slop
I really do not get the eagerness to outsource self expression. Wtf is wrong with these people.
They sold their souls to imperialism long ago. They think AI adoption will decide who the next big dog is, so they'll eat it up without question
The mindset is 'people with integrity, ethics and morals don't win'. So they kill that part of themselves to prove they're capable of winning at any cost. It's a fear of eat or be eaten that drives every fascists motives.
The unironic punishment for fascism should just be being forced to relocate to the jungle.
Want to return to monke so badly? That’s your prerogative. But it has no place among the civilized. We’ll be happy to relocate any of these would-be Tarzans so they can be happy and we can be happy.
It’s like they read Hobbes and are furious he criticized the nasty, brutish, short life they want to live.
That's a really good explanation for why these people do this, thank you!
Really? Sometimes I think I just sound like I'm rambling incoherently lol
No it's good, I didn't connect the Fascist "might makes right" sort of stuff to the AI worship until you laid it out and in retrospect it seems really obvious why they would love AI, because it is literally being sold using FOMO stuff, which is also how Fascist operate.
You'd think with how widely know the tell tale signs are they'd put in a minimum of effort.
Fucking Keter class cognitohazard here. Get your amnesetics ready because you're gonna fucken need them. This is the most words I have ever seen just to say "I want to do what I want and you should want me to, too"
Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation.
So noble that Palantir is fulfilling its obligation to the nation, all for the paltry stipend of $10 billion.
I suspect "nation" here doesn't just mean "the american state". I suspect they mean nation in terms of races, the white nation.
- The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed.
we have to build the killbots first before they build the killbots first
Nononono, this time building the doomsday superweapon will ensure peace
This line has been the line in every war since, what, WWII at least? We don't have time to debate, we just have to make big weapons and use them on civilians right now or all of this will end.
We don't have time for some theoretical debate
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed.
Enriched weapons-grade projection right here
We will not indulge in theatrical debate so here is a livejournal post I made when I was 16
Time and again, over the last century the US has made the world worse and justified it with this horseshit logic
Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public
Impressive fascism as material analysis through the mirror darkly
It's funny they use free email as an example as if they wouldn't murder the president who tried to do nationalized free email.
"Correction: email where we can read your personal communications and use that to serve precisely targeted ads is great"
The Palantir ghouls are a target of adventurism I hope to see soon.
Smh, fascists can't even write their own manifestos anymore. Just AI slop. Weak shit.
Somehow worse than Andreessen's manifesto too
So fucking cringe bro, honestly embarrassing

Matrix chat room: https://matrix.to/#/#midwestsociallemmy:matrix.org
Communities from our friends:
LiberaPay link: https://liberapay.com/seahorse