147
∟⊔⊤∦∣≶
LinuxNot strictly Linux..
But after reading about SystemD I realised that TempleOS would fall under the laws but there's no way in hell that's getting updated. There's gotta be some amazing way to troll the lawmakers with this.
It's a bit hard for him to comply. Why, you ask? Well, for starter, he's dead.
I'm getting to old for this age verification bullshit.
Those getting too old for this are the ones who are 14
"You wouldn't ask to put age verification on a Bible would you mister representative?"
If those people actually read the bible, they would never let a child near it.
"Does anyone else find it weird that all the Linux users were born on Jan 1st, 1970?"
TempleOS would fall under the laws
So would DOS and Windows 95, but those haven't had any updates in a couple years. Surely they'll be updated to comply.
FreeDOS' latest version is from 2025. Guess they would be required to comply. They don't even have user accounts...
Yeah, and I'd say it's a bit questionable whether California even has jurisdiction over revelations from God himself.
Also, I don't think it does networking and app stores 😄
there is a networking module in the Shrine fork. i think its internal name is "heretic" as it is against god's will.
SystemD is only adding the possibility to store an age for the user, and the PR is being debated still
Trojan horse, so to speak.
Preemtive capitulation is a loss for everyone but the fascists.
Why would a glorified scheduling service need to store my birthday? Or age. Am I soon supposed to show/store my ID to all services running on my computer?
The systemd service in question is probably already managing your accounts (if you've got systemd, that is)
