Also "Dozens" instead of "165"
When you point this type of thing out to the brainwashed, they act like you're "reaching". As if they can't just examine "does my own worldview reflect the claim being made here?" And figure out that yes the way shit like that is worded controls their worldview
also doesn't mention 165 dead girls
the official podcast of !chapotraphouse@hexbear.net prepared me for this
The nytimes is garbage. It was a zionist rag always, but somehow the ghetto rebellion broke their brains, and I'm not sure they aren't on the epstein list at this point, pieces of fucking shit all.
I keep a whole file of these for the rhetoric class I teach. This is gold.
You don't happen to have any other screenshots of glaring examples, do you? I would love to share this one and others with my mom.
The New York times is an organization of war criminal genociders and always has been
From the spanish american war on they have been a mouthpiece of military adventurism. They had a rather brief moment as the opposition rag to the republicans for the useless dems, but have since surrendered.
"Dozens" is also incorrect by a factor of 12, it would have to be Dozen Dozens to get the correct amount of destruction it caused
To be fair this was early and they have since updated to "175+"
To compensate they changed it to "Iranian State media says..." even though it's been verified elsewhere and left in the passive language with no mention of the perpetrator
I think people at the NYT actually believe that because it's a private company it can't also be state media.
Also America is a privately owned state.
