GrapheneOS - break free from Google and Apple
(blog.tomaszdunia.pl)
Privacyby using a Pixel...
Buy one used to not financially support them. GrapheneOS only supports Pixel phones as they are the only ones which meet the security requirements.
https://grapheneos.org/faq#supported-devices
I will always laugh at their "security requirements"
What is wrong with them?
I'm looking into getting a Jolla, though I'm sure the security probably doesn't match up to GrapheneOS. They seem more privacy oriented and these days I'd like to contribute to the existence of European alternatives.
https://commerce.jolla.com/products/jolla-phone-preorder
Break free from Google by giving your money to Google!
I bought my Pixel 9 refurbished (as new).
Refurbished is a thing. So is
::: spoiler Spoiler stealing :::
Doesn't matter if it's at the beginning or end of the pipeline. It's feeding the demand.
I have a second hand Pixel for GrapheneOS to compromise without being compromised. Was degoogled with Lineage for many years, but it was becoming too much of a problem. I'm not happy owning literally a Google phone. Felt I had no choice.
Really, regulators are needed to sort this out. Consumer choice doesn't work with dualopy.
I understand the complexity of supporting different hardware, but i cannot take this thing seriously while it only runs on google pixel phones.
Nothing else meets the secuirty requirements and they don't want to comprimise.
https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices
Just use IodeOS, CalyxOS, /e/OS or just LineageOS to break free. Those are available for a many devices. Not only Pixel.
The level of security, of privacy and of granular control of those does not come even close to what GrapheneOS brings to the table. Additionally Iodè and /e/OS have some noise going on with not being private at all. And all of them, except LineageOS (some times) have long delays with security patches.
/e/OS uses OpenAI for voice-to-text. Iodé has closed source components (trust me bro?). What do they claim? "some protection is better than none". In security that is ridiculous.
Then there is choosing between Microg vs actual sandboxed Google Play Services (which you don't need to have at all on GrapheneOS if you don't want to).
/e/OS signs their OS with Google test keys instead of their own keys.
Unconfirmed, but concerning is the claims of ties of those 2 (Iodé and /e/OS) with the French government, not unlike Chinese companies with the CCP.
Choosing LineageOS, or even CalyxOS are options I would consider if I wasn't willing or able to get a Pixel device, but Iodé and /e/OS are absolute 'no' in my book. Too many holes, too pragmatic (and I'm trying to be nice using that word) for my taste.
the security not close, but its already a big leap from stock rom, and most likely dont need to waste money on a pixel.
yes, but you have to use a pixel.
Wao 🤣
We need data portability laws to really untie people from these platforms.
And competition law enforced. Consumer choice doesn't work when it's a stitched up market like this.
I'm using Graphene for around a 6 months now on a Pixel 9, with F-Droid being the primary app source. I quite like it.
have you needed to use microG for any apps? is it a sufficient replacement for google play?
MicroG isn't necessary with Grapheneos's sandboxed Google Play.
Apart from unnecessary, pretty sure it's also unsupported to begin with
Aurora is also a good substitute store if you don't want to use sandboxed Google Play, but anything that uses Google Play Services will likely be borked
Still using Windows 10 Mobile.
I’m waiting for a phone to meet Graphene’s requirements that isn’t made by Google. Then I’ll switch. Hope it happens sooner rather than later.
I initially considered that, but in the end I just bit the bullet and got one 2 weeks ago.
My thought is with the current trend of PC hardware prices, I didn't want to wait to see how it affects phone prices.
At the same time, I do not know if the collaborative phone between GOS and the manufacturer will be something I like. The current Pixel 10 phone is already bigger than what I ultimately prefer and I think it's more probable the new phone will be phablet sized.
And this is something I’ve been thinking about too. While I dislike the idea of giving money to Google, it might be something I have to just make my peace with as a one time purchase for the next few years (I’m not the kind of user that has to have the newest device when it comes out). I dislike phablets too, so I always try to avoid them. I also didn’t consider PC hardware issues like ram availability and such affecting the prices of phones until now, so good of you to bring it up. I’ll think about it.
will be phablet sized
Already is... but it is what it is. Welcome to gOS, we don't have cookies ;}
Have never looked back since i switched to gos... just buy a refurbed pixel to avoid giving big G ya monry.
Remember, though, in less than 200 days google kills all "sideloading." It seriously fucks with gos, and they have hinted they will eventually disable flashing custom roms
TL;DR The above commenter is spreading FUD. GOS will work fine and allow sideloading.
Stop spreading FUD. Google kills sideloading on Google certified ROMs. Being Google certified doesn't mean you have more features than ROMs which aren't certified. Only Google certified ROMs lose the ability to sideload and have to adhere to all Google Play policies. Meaning GOS loses its certified status but doesn't lose the ability to sideload. The only way in which GOS might be coerced to disable sideloading is if Google pushes these changes upstream to the AOSP and even then forking is always an option. Also when has Google ever hinted at disabling flashing custom ROMs? It might be right down their alley but I wouldn't make such claims without citing sources.
Just as a side note: Android ≠ AOSP. This is relevant as many people misunderstand the news they read. When Google changes Android (Google's proprietary AOSP "distro") it doesn't necessarily mean that changes are coming to the AOSP or GOS which is also an AOSP "distro".
Reading through this forum thread is recommended.
I use GOS and I am all for correcting people, but perhaps next time, don't assume they are spreading FUD, and instead assume they are just misinformed
I don't see how spreading FUD and being misinformed are exclusive. I didn't say he was doing so in bad faith, just stating that the comment created fear, uncertainty and doubt without any factual basis.
To be fair Wikipedia does say it is a manipulative propaganda tactic but I've usually meant it in the abovementioned context.
Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to ignorance and stupidity.
Im not trying to "spread fud." The state of 3rd party software on android is where it is. Google is introducing a high friction system for unverified apps that includes fees paid directly to google, and is not releasing to aosp in advance at all... this potentially means things like f droid and aurora cant operate. It doesnt mean that gos wont "allow" sideloading, but that you wont have alternatives to load. It also means you will have to increasingly be limited to sandboxed google play, with more barriers to overcome to make those apps work on non-android. https://www.androidauthority.com/android-changes-third-party-app-stores-3613409/
Wish i could find where i read that google was planning to eliminate bootloader access... they walked it back in the end after expected uproar. Ultimately, the pressure from 'verified by google' and the changes to AOSP are enough pressure to push out ROMS as it is...
https://www.androidauthority.com/android-rom-calyxos-support-freeze-google-blame-3590268/
Anyway, listen. I LOVE graphene. Everyone should use it, BECAUSE google is demonstrably a band of fuckwits. Im not trying to dissuade but inform. I am excited for an announcement about who theyre working with when they say their future is a phone made in connjunction with a "major OEM" maker. https://www.androidheadlines.com/2025/10/grapheneos-may-break-pixel-exclusivity-with-a-new-phone-in-2026.html
I don't doubt that in the future Google will kill off the AOSP and disable installing custom ROMs like Apple does. But it just isn't accurate to say that in 200 days sideloading on GOS won't work or that Google disabling sideloading on their ROM even affects GOS in any way.
Aren't there things GrapheneOS can't do though like banking, wallet, and bus pass? I hope im misinformed because I'd love to switch to an alt OS.
Most banking works fine. There was a time it had more problems but I don't even need to use a secondary profile with Google Play Services running any longer.
NFC works, but that is app specific. So no, wallet won't work because google wallet wants Google services to work. But in the EU some banks have their own contactless payments that work fine. In the US none do to my knowledge. For bus pass etc that would be down to your app and if they require google services or not. There's always the option for secondary profiles.
To me, I was amazed at his many apps use google services for notifications. So many apps work, but don't give me notifications unless I open the app... Which I'm okay with because 99% of them I would turn off anyways.
You can sandbox Google Play services and 99% of things will work that way
I use my USAA banking app, my stock app with Charles-Schwabb, and even Bitwarden with biometrics on GOS. It may have been limiting before, but not anymore. They have a sandboxed Google Play integrity whatever, too, do you can turn that shit on for select apps and it alerts you when an app is calling it.
Aurora Store also has the Play Store apps with reduced bloat. I've been using GOS on my Pixel 7 since late last year. It has a slight learning curve, but lots of info out there for how and what to change in settings for different apps and permissions. Definitely don't regret my install!
Very encouraging!
Fairphone 6. Google can suck it. As long as people support the company, competition is coming. Hopefully, they have the resources to keep on going after Google shits on everyone.
When I started my degoogle process some time back & researching options I literally laughed at loud at myself. Am I seriously going to hand over yet more money to the very beast I am trying to get away from? Talk about instant compromise of values
Years later, extremely proud of that decision. Just a non starter. Buying second hand also creates a market value for selling more google crap
No OS comes close to Graphene in security. Second hand sales for Graphene are a drop in the bucket for Google. If Graphene went away and people stopped buying second hand Pixels for that purpose, it wouldn't even be a blip to them.
You do you. I stand by my principals and don't feel the need to pretend I'm some sort of Jason Bourne.
Weird how now that Google went quarterly with their older device updates... it's suddenly just not the big deal the GOS folks used as a hammer, with their ad nauseum attacks on other privacy projects. Back then I could smell their overhyped, overplayed security scare marketing tactics from a mile away. As it turns out, I was right.
Not having any google crap in my household? Absoltely priceless
If you don't value security, that's fine, but one does not need to be Jason Bourne to want a secure device. Also, privacy ≠ security.
If you are willing to believe that google of all people don't have backdoors into their own first party hardware, you do you.
Gah. I was really torn between replacing my broken Pixel with another Pixel+GOS or buying a Fairphone 6...
I ended up going with the Fairphone 6 cuz I want to support other players. I'm not completely off Google, but I keep moving away where I can.
I wish Fairphone and Graphene were friends... :/
If fairphone had the hardware support and kept up with modern android versions, GOS would have no beef.
Graphene coming with OEM phones other than pixel so it will solve those issues
Break free from Google! By buying a Google phone...
That's precisely my biggest problem with GrapheneOS
This betrays a deep level of tech illiteracy
Not knowing you can buy used/refurbished betrays a deep level of real life illiteracy
I know you can buy used and refurbished actually, that's how I got my pixel. It's still buying a Google phone. It still breaks free from Google. You have now reached the point of just regular old illiteracy I guess
Break free from Google with buying Google product? Lol
Ironic but true
Meh, there are better phones that actually support an open source community.
Fairphone with e/os has been working pretty awesome for me.
If what you care about is security though, nothing comes close to Graphene.
I care more about privacy and freedom.
e/OS is fantastic, IodeOS also IMO, plenty good choices. LineageOS with rethinkDNS in whitelist only mode is also amazing
And for extra goodness supporting open source apps without trackers
All without handing yet more $$$ to nasty google, imagine that
There's no reason not to buy a second hand Pixel.
other than a burning hatred for google that prevents you from participating in keeping the resale market high. lol
Other than security differences, is the interface just like on a Pixel? Can I still force dark mode on uncooperative apps like on Pixel? Is there still notification history? Screenshots/select on overview?
Don't remember if the interface was much different. Forced dark mode and notification history work fine. You can take screenshots in the overview, not sure about select, maybe you need an app?
If only something more than Pixels was supported.
Blame literally every other hardware manufacturer for not implementing encryption enclaves correctly.
Most manufacturers don't even allow you to unlock your bootloader nowadays. And the requirement of relocking it with custom keys basically means only Pixel phones (plus a few VERY old non-pixel phones) pass this absolutely basic requirement.
Oh yes the magical security black box that is 100% trust worthy! Surely nothing can ever wrong!
SOON
™
We will probably get GTA VI first.
Maybe even Star Citizen!
Do you recommend putting it on pixel 6? Or is it outdated?
If you already have one go for it. My 6 with GOS runs significantly better than my 8 with stock android. I wouldn't buy one specifically for it though, I'd go newer since it will be supported longer.
older pixels have fewer years of GOS dev support remaining. recommend 7+
GOS is great. Funny, I used to rom hop and distro hop a lot; but on GOS, I installed it once and so far so good (5+ months in).
Just some tips for new users: Just install it and dont be afraid to try things out (Google Store, profiles, Aurora...etc). Oh and dont make it tooooo complicate with many profiles and private space. You can test first but dont over do it if you're not experienced.
And no, I am not a dev from GOS lol. I'm an ordinary user who wants to take control of my phone.
I got a new (to me) pixel a bit ago and haven't switched back cause life has been crazy. I miss GOS. Maybe this weekend I'll have a minute to do that.
Just some tips for new users: Just install it and dont be afraid to try things out (Google Store, profiles, Aurora…etc). Oh and dont make it tooooo complicate with many profiles and private space.
I recommend a clean main profile (i.e. no Google Play etc) and a corrupt profile, install your stuff then find FOSS replacements for main. Over time you naturally decouple from Google, but it's there if you need it.
I ran various custom ROM's for years on a FairPhone3+. It was great right up until the day all my banking apps stopped working. Banking app incompatibility is NOT the fault of GrapheneOS (or any other custom ROM) dev's at all . . . but IMO this is the real problem today with any alternative mobile OS. Privacy vs. banking convenience. And yes, YMMV as some of them do work . . and mine did as well . . right up until the day they didn't.
Just use a web browser.
People act like they can't live without these apps, which are often just a repackaged website anyway.
I would use banking through the browser for sure, but to be able to login on the browser i can only receive the pin through the app. not only this ,but everytime i make a purchase online I have to authorize the transaction through the app. There is no other way, they don't even offer a physical token anymore.
If you don't mind disclosing, what bank is that?
Nice idea in theory . . . but here in the UK, increasingly customers are being left with little other choice. Between banking apps using push messages to verify credit/debit card transactions, closing of physical branches and requiring authentication via the app to log into the website . . . not using their app is becoming more and more difficult every day.
pushTAN?
Do banking exclusively through the online portals? For me, if that means using my desktop or a laptop for banking, that's what I do, because I will not install a banking app on my phone.
Nice idea in theory . . . but here in the UK, increasingly customers are being left with little other choice. Between banking apps using push messages to verify credit/debit card transactions, closing of physical branches and requiring authentication via the app to log into the website . . . not using their app is becoming more and more difficult every day.
What services do they have for senior citizens? Because they are the most likely ones to not want to use technology. You can probably piggyback on what they use.
They are offering free classes for seniors to teach them how to use the apps.
https://www.finextra.com/newsarticle/35627/lloyds-to-provide-free-digital-skills-training-and-tablets-for-elderly-customers
not every bank lets you
Switch banks. That's what I did. I had a bank that required an app to use them as well before I decided that I cared about my privacy and wanted more of it. And when I found out that my bank wouldn't let me do things, I switched banks. Because fuck them.
Generally it's neobanks that cause the most problems. If you're using older banks that have been around for quite a long time, they don't have nearly the technology, so are less likely to have this occur. In the United States, an example of this might be something like Wells Fargo or Discover or something like that, whereas one of these neobanks that would cause problems would be like chime.
Generally, stay away from thin tech and stay with actual banks. You might also look at credit unions. My local credit union is really good, and has a good online website, and has an app as well, but doesn't require it at all.
i'm not aware of any i can switch to in my country that doesn't require a phone and an annoying pairing process.
I might make a post about banks that don't require apps or collect data. Mine is stupid about it if you don't opt out. I'm so sick of every business normalizing this.
I use several banks and several credit unions, and the only thing I can't do with a laptop is deposit checks (which is getting pretty rare).
FinTech products like PayPal, Venmo, Cash.app, BlueBird and such often require a phone app, but aren't regulated banks, and are best avoided when possible.
Same here, I might end up with a check in my hands like once per year, and so I have to make like one single trip to my credit union every single year or whatever to deposit that check, and that's it.
my condolences are you euro?
south american.
I didn't know they rolled like that, good to know for the purposes of learning about banking & surveillance systems. haven't seen it mentioned on GOS forums
the facial scanning tech you guys are starting to see used against you now has been trialed in your colonies first to make sure it works well for them.
boomerang is just now coming back on this one.
Exactly! I’d love to switch, but I rely on my banking apps too much. That’s a dealbreaker for me as well.
Nfc payments keep me chained. I guess i can get a second phone just for setting up a watch, but i don't want a watch. So i live by not using the default launcher and a vpn. I'm working to change my email provider slowly
I was seriously considering getting an over priced pixel phone just so I could get graphene os, but then I discovered, that rooting it is impossible. Pity
Rooting is not possible because of the security risks posed by doing so. You could technically build your own GOS with root enabled, but that's not recommended
This attitude is, to me, very security through obscurity. I did consider your idea, but on the whole can't be bothered 🤷
Can you elaborate on how it's security through obscurity? I'm just saying what the devs have said. It does make sense though that if you provide root access that it could be easier for malicious devices to gain root access and therefore take more harmful actions
Utter hogwash. If I don't have a device, a hacker can't gain access to it. That's security through obscurity. Make things stronger, not evasive
Not sure what you mean by "if I don't have a device"? Also I meant malicious apps moreso than malicious devices. If you have root access then if a malicious app gets control there's basically no restrictions on what it can do given root access.
Also as far as plain hacking the phone, not through a bad app but through an external device. Pegasus (although probably an unlikely scenario for the average person) can basically hack any smartphone, with the exception of grapheneOS (there were some leaked slides from a meeting a while back that essentially confirmed this).
You say "make things stronger", well sandboxing and improved permissions access do make for stronger, more contained systems, and grapheneOS improves on both of those. Root access basically provides a sledgehammer to all of that
Another reply did the thinking emoji face at biometrics and that’s good. Here’s why it’s worthwhile to never enable biometrics:
You don’t know when you’re going to be compelled to use them and you don’t drill on turning them off.
The whole point of no knock and other police tactics is to prevent you from keeping them from getting what they want. You can’t expect yourself to just never be surprised, that’s ridiculous. Turn biometrics off so getting surprised by the cops doesn’t immediately give them the keys to the castle!
No one drills enough, but let’s say you’re the one person who does drill enough on turning off biometrics: wouldn’t that practice time be better spent with biometrics off, drilling on shutting your phone down so they have to deal with its much more secure Before First Unlock state instead?
Turn off biometrics and practice turning your phone off.
I wonder is this something to actually worry about outside of the US?
In my country police are known to torture people until they sign a confession written by them. So I don't think disabling biometrics will make a difference. But I've still done it.
nobody should discount hardware-level hacks either. ultimately GOS is the only way to get decent software on mobile without leaving it exposed in the event of petty theft. people implying it will be a serious roadblock to imperialist state-level actors are naive or even suspicious to me
Yes it absolutely is.
Every nation has a byzantine system of laws and codes enumerating different ways for police to violate the “rights” that nation has enshrined in law.
One way to avoid compelled speech (a “right” Americans have but other nations citizens might not) is to simply misremember your lock code as many times as it takes to trigger factory reset.
Americans don’t need to know that because they can’t be compelled to enter a passkey, but people in countries with no qualms about compelled speech like Germany would be well served by disabling biometrics so they have the option of lying and taking that hit instead of giving up their privacy.
Do your own research about your jurisdiction, but go ahead and turn off biometrics because it literally makes any group that can control your movement (which in English common law is the basis for the concept of “arrest”, and so likely a situation many different nationalities will face) access to your devices.
FWIW gOS has a duress PIN baked in. Doesn't stop the rubber hose but at least you can be smug ;}
The duress pin seems like such a cool feature, but I feel like it flies a little too close to the sun.
Misremembering your own pin ten times stretches the limit of credulity, but a lawyer could argue that under the circumstances of enhanced interrogation you weren’t able.
Expressly giving the wrong answer in a place with compelled speech threatens to add a million new legal hurdles to your freedom.
When you fuck it up ten times they’re gonna try to slap you with those charges anyway but at least you have some defense instead of it being an open and shut case of “he’s recorded entering the evidence destruction button when we asked him nicely to instead let us push the evidence retrieval button”
For assange types (and I mean people actively under threat by a nation which has a set of charges it’s investigating or planting evidence for, not people who have leaked documents or share his ideals) it’s a good thing, but anyone not dodging the “if I walk out of the embassy they’ll “find” cp on my phone” bullet it seems like more trouble than it’s worth.
Valid in many cases (hence the rubber hose quip), I was merely responding to above. It does have use as a quick way to burn it all down before any requests are made.
Yeah sorry to hit you with a wall of text.
Between all the people who refuse to use graphene because it’s on pixels and the ones who seem like they haven’t been keeping up with the news or even had any interaction with cops this thread is deeply disturbing and hitting all the buttons that make me wanna say No Don’t Do That!
Who knows, maybe there’s a good case where someone uses the duress and gets away with it. I think assange did once before…
"all laws are local, and no law knows how local it is", which is to say it on the user to understand their local legal (and political) situation. It's a big world.
Thanks, I plan on doing this when my phone dies. Just some questions:
A computer with a Chromium-based browser (e.g., Google Chrome, Brave, Microsoft Edge, Vivaldi?). Unfortunately, I must recommend Windows 10/11 here, because then you don’t have to mess around with any drivers; it’s the simplest option.
This is the first I've read this, how much of a pain is it to use Linux instead? I don't have any Windows computers.
First of all, we need to make sure that our phone’s software is updated to the latest available version. For this purpose, we go to Settings -> System -> System update. If necessary, we update
How is this possible if the previous step skipped SIM and Wifi setup? I assume, if there's updates, to setup Wifi then proceed?
securing the phone with a fingerprint; I personally am an advocate of this solution...
Recommend not doing this for users in the USA, as police can compel you to unlock biometric locks. Yes, it's fucked up, that's what happens when octogenarian fascists run all three branches of your government.
This is the first I've read this, how much of a pain is it to use Linux instead? I don't have any Windows computers.
No issues at all. Not sure what drivers the author was referring to but using the web installer you pretty much just plug the phone in and click through some buttons.
Recently had a similar issue with Via, the app for keyboards. Basically, there was an issue with chrome talking to the hardware...Except some lifesaver recommended plugging my keyboard directly into my machine, bypassing the docking station (the thing causing me issues) and fixing my problem. So I've technically still never had a driver issue, only a shitty docking station experience.
GrapheneOS has guides for installing regardless of platform, here's the relevant page on their official site.
GrapheneOS supports a "duress password" that you can enter to lock up the phone and securely erase any data stored - it's designed for those situations (so just push that pin in if you're in that situation).
CLI installation guide is perfect, thank you.
This is the first I’ve read this, how much of a pain is it to use Linux instead? I don’t have any Windows computers.
You only need a browser that supports WebUSB.
Chrome and Brave support WebUSB on Linux.
How is this possible if the previous step skipped SIM and Wifi setup? I assume, if there’s updates, to setup Wifi then proceed?
I believe that vendors can include updates on the device that sit in the same fastboot space as you'll be using to install Graphene. By running the system update, it applies any lingering patches, clearing the space for the Graphene install. The update (without SIM or Wifi) will only work if this is the case. So this step is more 'ensure that there are no updates on the disk that will screw up the install' than 'make sure your phone is up to date'... since Graphene has its own methods for applying patches.
I feel as though having biometrics installed, Face ID and/or fingerprint, kind of defeats the purpose of a privacy OS. Where as pin and a duress pin would be the choice going forward and managing the phones security.
It depends on your threat level.
For daily use the fingerprint sensor is just practical. I use it with a secondary pin, so finger and a short pin hits the right balance of security and convenience for me. If I cross borders or join a protest, biometrics are removed beforehand.
I flashed my pixel to graphene on Linux without any issue. I used an arch based distro and temporarily installed Brave to perform the flash.
This is the first I’ve read this, how much of a pain is it to use Linux instead?
I flashed it on my 8a a couple of weeks ago using Chromium on EndeavourOS without issues.
I put grapheneos on my current phone using my previous phone (samsung s22) and a usb c cable. Wasn't hard at all, just had to follow the prompts.
Linux works broadly across a wide range of hardware, but it's not 100%. You can ``very easily test hardware compatibility with a Live USB install of most Linux distros. Windows is a way bigger driver pain in the ass if you ask me.
I don't remember if I did my phone on Linux or windows, but depending on your Linux install you may or not have drivers pre installed. That's more of a result of Linux installing only what you need, vs windows installing everything someone might need.
As for wifi/updating, I don't see it as a necessary step on a new phone. However, for a new phone it may be worth loading the stock OS, and running with it for a day or 2 just to make sure everything (WiFi, battery life, cell, BT, etc) actually works before you go crazy troubleshooting a problem that was there out of the box.
Once you do get Graphene installed, you'll then want to check for any updates.
While having Finger print on/off is everyone's personal choice, it is pretty easy to lock down the phone. You can spam the wrong finger a few times and it will force the pin requirement or if you press and hold the power button a lockdown button appears, either way it only takes a few seconds.
Despite what the news would lead you to believe, most people aren't talking to police every day. That being said, if you are going to be in an area with high police presence, than turning off the finger print is 100% recommended.
Smooth installation here with Vivaldi on Ubuntu (or fedora, not sure as I was distro hoppping a lot at the time)
I was running LineageOS, but my screen broke so I just bought a trap phone with cash from Wal-Mart.
I bought the 10 pro fold when it came out and flashed it to grapheneos right out of the box.
I bought a pixel 10 because I wanted face unlock for contactless payments (level 3 biometric).
But from what I've read in the past, GrapheneOS doesn't work with most banking apps let alone payments.
Just tap the card and check your bank account via browser?
We've been doing electronic payment and banking without smartphones for decades...
My primary bank is phone only.
I'd fucking switch banks lmao, that's atrocious.
I'm sorry dawg.
I actually quite like it. The bank is called Monzo and the app is well presented. Support is fast and I hardly ever go to the bank anyway. Post offices play the role for cash and cheque deposits.
Sounds shady
It depends on your bank. I have brazilian banks that work perfectly well with tap, they just don't rely on Google Wallet.
beastmode
Also, break free from RCS and from participating in group chats with anyone you can't convince to move to another platform.
I daily drive grapheneOS, and wouldn't go back to iOS or Google-ed Android for anything, but it really sucked having to tell friends, family, and others I couldn't participate in our old group chats anymore.
EDIT: Apparently, they released a fix over the weekend, as aoude pointed out in another comment. So it's working for me on AT&T now.
Link to instructions: https://grapheneos.org/usage#rcs
For me this is nonnegotiable, I have plenty of family and friends that I'm in group RCS chats and it's unreasonable to expect other people to confirm to your privacy expectations. I limit non-Signal chats when possible, but in many cases it's either RCS or miss important conversations with family and friends
Totally understood. It wasnt a deal-breaker for me, but I can see how it would be for others.
I've seen on the grapheneOS discuss boards that some people have gotten it to work, but none of their fixes have worked for me.
I am on T-Mobile and up until this weekend it was definitely broken. People had temporary workarounds but nothing seemed to stick. This weekend a new build was released with a specific setting that provides the ability to use RCS on T-Mobile (and I think At&t is fixed too)
https://grapheneos.org/usage#rcs
It worked! I'll update my original comment! Thank you again!
I'm on AT&T so I will definitely try it!
Thank you!
Did not see your other comments, glad it worked for you!
2 quirks I found that were easily fixed, not sure if you will find them handy:
- Weather app automatic locations doesn't work --> enable geocoder in settings > location > location services
- Google maps location lock doesn't work until leaving parking garages --> settings > location > location services > network location
I tried to switch to grapheneOS after my iPhone broke. RCS incompatibility is why I ended up purchasing another refurbished iPhone.
Managed to get my immediate family to try out Signal, but the fact that EXIF data was stripped from photos made it a no-go. We share photos in our group chat very often, and photos saved from Signal having the wrong date/time and no location drove them bonkers.
Outside of immediate family, most of my friends would only communicate through Discord...yeah, no thanks, I'd rather use iMessage lol.
I’d likely make the jump if they supported Google pay. But they don’t, so iPhone it is now
I've gladly given up Google pay, can you really rely on your phone and completely go without a card anyways? I always carried my cards as a backup just in case so it's hardly a convenience IMO
I don’t remember the last time I brought my cards with me. Needs to be on my phone.
I suppose it's just a matter of perspective. "Needs to" is a bit strong imo. Do you carry a license? Those are generally not available digitally. Also what about a worst case scenario where your phone is dead, broken, stolen, or payments are not working?
“Needs to” may be a bit strong for you, but for me it’s legit. I will NOT switch to an OS without Google Pay, Apple Pay, or Samsung Pay.
If my phone is dead, broken, or stolen, I use my watch.
~~There's also the risk that credit card companies are claiming that fraud done using your phone app (for example, someone stole your unlocked phone(*)) is not covered, and you are on the hook for losses.~~
But stolen physical credit cards are always covered.
(*)EDIT: I thought I'd read a report that someone who had been mugged and forced to give their phone+PIN had an issue with their CC company; but it looks like this is mostly a problem with money transferred out of a bank account, not credit card purchases... and even then, hiring a lawyer will usually get the bank to pay-up.
Credit card companies can claim whatever they want, that’s not how their agreement works. They need to cover. But also the risk of someone stealing my unlocked phone is so exponentially lower than the risk of someone stealing my cards that I’m not even remotely concerned.
Interesting, but I don't think there's anything in that article that actually mentions credit card companies did not cover the loss? Did I miss that somehow?
sorry, I think I was confusing bank transfers with credit card transactions.
This OS is pointless. I have a Motorola Edge. It's like the OS is written by Google fanbois. Know what would be cool? Something that works on many types of phones.
Too bad those other phones have shit security hardware. That's the only reason Graphene uses Pixels.
I believe specifically designed to take advantage of security hardware only available on Pixels. Don't think it has to do with being Google fanboys necessarily.
Ubuntu touch works on most android phones and has a handful with official support
