The March 14 directive, signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi, uses an obscure 18th-century law — the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 — to give law enforcement nationwide the power to bypass basic constitutional protections.

According to the memo, agents can break into a home if getting a warrant is “impracticable,” and they don’t need a judge’s approval. Instead, immigration officers can sign their own administrative warrants. The bar for action is low — a “reasonable belief” that someone might be part of a Venezuelan gang is enough.

Well, constitutionally, they can't for whatever that's worth now.

That bold faced liar can go right to hell.

Looking forward to this being challenged in a state with Stand Your Ground laws where warrantless trespassing is legally the same as any other trespassing.

I'm personally opposed to lethal force being used to protect property in general, but there are places where that is essentially legal due to Stand Your Ground laws.

Your opposed to it, but now you also see the sole reason the 2nd exists. If ever the government does something like warrantless trespassing, it's our civic duty to use our 2nd amendment rights to remind them we oppose tyranny. That said, never thought this would happen in our lifetimes. Worlds a changing.

There are very few people who would survive this tactic though.

Still seems like a stupid plan—2nd amendment or not (which is really not what the 2nd was about before courts made it anyway). At best you take one with you on the way out, if you’re ready when they break in. At this point I’d still rather be detained than dead.

If everyone they illegally targeted managed to take one this problem would be quickly resolved

Any statement that begins with "If everyone one..." is going to be followed by something that would be great, but won't happen. As much as we may both 100% believe it should.

I've never imagined I'd survive a fascist regime.

^ This, 100%

Some of us don’t have the luxury to keep our heads down and blend in when fascists want to target those who are “different.” That’s why I am outspoken about it - I can’t hide who I am, and even if I could, I’d refuse to live a lie.

I don’t have kids, I don’t have pets, the only person depending on my survival is me. If fascists come to take me, I’d rather go down and take them with me than go into the black hole (an entity from which nothing escapes) of a foreign prison/death camp.

To assume one will merely be “detained” and given due process in the United States is, sadly, a naïve take in 2025.

🫡

Fuck fascists

At this point I’d still rather be detained than dead.

I'm well past that point. Especially with this fascist dictatorship. Being detained will likely get us tortured or thrown into a concentration camp. I'd rather die resisting these fuckers than die in some torture room.

Thus far these bozos have demonstrated a pattern of showing up without uniforms, with masks on, refusing to identify themselves, show badges, or produce warrants.

This is needless to say an incredibly stupid thing for them to do, especially if they plan to also go around kicking in people's doors. I personally know an old man who got off the hook for shooting a state cop in my area who tried the same. I think the only hope the Dummkstaffel here has of making a charge stick against a homeowner who blows one of them away will be to somehow make it Federal, because otherwise I think the state courts -- especially in blue areas -- are not going to treat any warrantless door-kicking by nonuniformed armed men who refuse to identify themselves very kindly.

Edit to add: You're also not protecting your "property" in such a case, you are protecting your person, which is a very different thing both legally and ethically. If the alternative is that you're going to be whisked away without due process to a death camp in El Salvador, your only rational course of action is to stand and fight -- especially in your own home.

Also, the person may go to jail, but dead is dead. The person shot will be gone, and may make others be more cautious, as hopelessly goulish as that thought is. I hope that things calm down and the rule of law returns before things escalate that far. I don't recognize the country right now.

Well, that's pretty much how the entire crime and punishment system is supposed to work. Do the crime, get got for it, others hoping to do the same thing will hopefully think twice before doing so in the future.

Therefore I think it's completely fair that this script gets flipped on the fascists who are pretending to be "law" enforcement.

I think the only hope the Dummkstaffel here has of making a charge stick against a homeowner who blows one of them away will be to somehow make it Federal

It would be federal, because it would be a federal agent getting shot. Any murder of a federal officer--including postal carriers--is a federal crime, in addition to being a state crime. OTOH, remember that a large number of federal judges are not friendly to Herr Fuhrer.

Yes, and also aren't hordes of these dipshits local cops that Trump is aiming to "deputize" to assist ICE? Those guys are not Federal agents no matter how hard they wish.

Warrants from entities involved in enforcement aren't warrants for the 4th amendment.

Doesn’t seem like it really matters if the courts rule against it. The judicial branch has no enforcement mechanism, and no one seems to be willing to escalate.

Yes they do. The US Marshall service is considered the judicial armed police force. Though at the moment they enforce immigration as one of their functions they would be the ones to arrest federal cops for doing unconstitutional (illegal) shit in theory.

Unfortunately wrong. The marshals work for Pam Bondi at the DOJ. Still under the control of the executive.

Sounds like something an illegal alien would say..... /s

Where are the 2A advocates when you need them.

Silently supporting this... After all the babies we sacrificed at school to keep their guns under threat of tyranny... Well it's freaking here and where are they? Oh being the disingenuous bags a shit they have always been

My MIL went from being an anti-gun democrat to going with my partner and I for shooting lessons this weekend. It's never publicized, but if you keep your head up, you can see the winds change.

Edit, because I realized I was unclear: This administration woke her up to the dangers of disarming the workers. She's moved farther left.

You're going to get into a firefight with federal cops with your wife around? Genuinely asking what the "find out" part is

What’s the alternative? Stay silent and let her disappear to the El Salvador death camp? Take a few of them with you.

Im willing to bet the odds she'll die at the death camp are lower than in a close quarters gunfight with a bunch of dumbfucks firing away.

Feel free to go out in an unnecessary blaze of glory though. Very macho 👌

I'd do my best to make sure I could see my wife again

Have fun not seeing her no matter your best then.

Either die in a hail of gunfire or never see her again isn't really the dilemma (yet). trump's deportations are fucking horrific, but these prisons do not have a 100% death rate. I figure our odds are better fighting to get her out alive rather than a gunfight.

Y'all can keep the wild west fantasy. I'm being realistic ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

disgusting low effort troll reply

I stand by the spirit of what I said but it was definitely more crass than intended. You probably wouldn't snitch on her but you would just say you'd see if you could get visitation as they take her.

I 100% understand what you mean and where you're coming from. The idea that I could have a loved one ripped away from me by fascists and sent to a camp is horrifying. I understand wanting to die rather than let that happen.

I'm approaching this rationally, though. YOU may be prepared to die at a moment's notice -- but what about your wife? Has she consented to dying in a barrage of bullets when the gestapo comes a-knockin'? I think the last time I looked it up, something like 12 people have died at the El Salvadorian prison. This is ignoring the deplorable conditions and the disturbing abuses that happen of course. I think my/their odds are better there than bleeding out on the floor.

It seems to me that the option that would most allow me to see that loved one again would be to avoid dying in the first place or placing them in harm's way.

if they kick the door in, they are there to kill you.

This isn't quite true. You are in mortal danger absolutely, but that danger multiplies tenfold when you draw a weapon and fire. They are there for political purposes to deport people. There's a monetary incentive in El Salvador to keep these political prisoners alive, too. If death squads begin roaming the streets, summarily executing people, then I will see the logic. Hell I'd take up arms.

I also think about the logistics of a firefight. Is your gun at the ready for when you hear a noise downstairs? Are you shooting into the dark? What if it's the incompetent Sherriff's office at the wrong house for a no-knock raid? What if they do knock? Where are you hiding? What happens after you're shot? Let's say you win the firefight -- what then? Do you flee? If so, why not just flee in the first place to avoid the chance of death? What if you're the only one that dies in the firefight and your wife is left alone? Is that better? What if just SHE dies? There is literally no way this goes down that works for me.

This is a scary time, and whatever plans I draw up will ensure the best chances of keeping my family alive. I hope you and yours are and stay safe.

If they show up. You're all dead regardless.

What about all the people who it's happened to that didn't die? I'm not saying it's good and to roll over, but pretending like a shootout somehow creates a better outcome is genuinely not based in reality... yet

Right here.

Shoot 'em in the dick.

Even if they have full-coverage soft armor, and not just a plate carrier, that's gonna drop 'em instantly. Can't walk with a 9mm through your pelvis, and there are a lot or arteries going through there.

Also, I'm a certified basic pistol instructor; if any of y'all are looking for non-chuds to get some basic training from, look up the Liberal Gun Club, the Socialist Rifle Association (altho competency varies a lot from chapter to chapter), or Operation Blazing Sword.

What lists do feds put you on for joining those

No clue, since it doesn't seem to stop you from getting NFA items approved.

Based on your instance, I'm going to have to assume you're Canadian and thus not informed on the minuta of state level politics and how they vary state to state. Some of the 2a people love going balls deep on authoritarian cock not all of us.

We're here.

uses an obscure 18th-century law — the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 — to give law enforcement nationwide the power to bypass basic constitutional protections

...That's not how the relationship between laws and the Constitution works.

Journalists don't need to just print both sides arguments and throw their hands up like determining truth is beyond them. Don't print lies and falsehoods without immediately pointing out they're lies and falsehoods. They didn't find a glitch in the system that maybe the courts will patch eventually, they're making up unlawful justifications to violate constitutional rights. Yeah, constitutional rights aren't going to save you from the violation, but we all need to know and establish that it's a violation in advance. ICE could always enter your home without a warrant, they just couldn't do it legally, and a memo from fascist Barbie hasn't changed that.

Still waiting on those nuts to step up to what they said they were keeping guns for.

No no those guns were to make sure they don't end up on the bottom.

You can go exercise your rights too.

Learn to shoot, might not be long before they’re kicking in your door.

I’m not going to some El Salvadoran death camp. If I’m gonna get killed by my own government, I’m going down swinging. Maybe I’ll take a few of the bastards with me.

Why?

Are you unarmed and regretting your anti gun political beliefs as you run head first into this brick wall of reality?

Your mistake is thinking that the media in the US employ journalists. They're oligarch controlled propaganda machines.

Not great

Hey that 60 Minutes producer quit because he couldn’t run the show independently anymore, so apparently sometimes oligarchs didn’t have complete control yet

Republicans would have turned in Anne Frank. This is truly some gestapo shit.

Republicans would be the ones looking for Anne Frank.

The hypotheticals have run out of runway. They're here.

Shit, Republicans would re-crucify Jesus as woke and harboring criminals.

So... where is that outrage from preppers and gun enthusaists of the government barging into their homes?

Can you image if Biden, Obama, or even Bush did this?

There would literally be a massive armed mob outside the White House.

Turns out guns are useless in the face of propaganda, I guess.

See they are not coming for their guns, so there does not appear to be a problem. Yet.

Turns out guns are useless in the face of propaganda, I guess.

This is the real takeaway. Orwell was right about a lot of shit, but the use of language as a means of control was extra prescient.

Correct. At this point a few ICE agents need to be treated as armed intruders and dealt with.

We don't do this in an armed society ... it's why we are armed.

It's a bold move Cotton, let's see how this test of the 2nd amendment plays out.

See you in El Salvador buddy.

the executive branch must abide by the law as it’s written

That's adorable.

Arm yourselves.

Having read the title and also the whole article.... Let me say. The fuck no you can't. Let's get letigious or let's get the vests. I've got over 200 years of jurisprecisence and the moral high road. We can skip the cultural perogative if you really want to. Or in this case you can endorse it. It doesn't matter to me. as a cisgender white male and, and prolific gun owner, who is utterly tired of this already, let's fuckin go. I've been waiting and i've finally got the perfect set up to tell you how many ways you can blow it out your ass.

Disgusting anti American anti constitutional blowhards all of them.

Love this energy. Get litigious first. The thugs like violence, but they cant win at court - at least not without their favourite judges.

This prescident isn't giving time to be litigious first. They will be in your home before you can dial 911, whom is likely helping this happen.

Yeah. Be ready ofc

ownership is 9/10 of the law, especially when the subject in question is your life

Haha thanks. I'll be honest. That post was made with a fair bit of unintentional inebriation, but I stand behind it. Don't do social media and imbibe, kids. But the message maintains. I've got a whole lot of privilege that the world said I should be careful and mindful of. I've been polite and aware and I've sincerely tried to not abuse it. I know how my lot in life has been easier than most . But now I'm ready to take full advantage of that. Let's fuckin go and let's make them write more checks their asses can cash. Because collection day is very very close.

While I’m on board, as a white cisgender male who can afford a lawyer, the problem comes when you add it to the other human rights violations of this administration. What are you going to do when guys in ski masks and overwhelming force break down your door and kidnap you out of the country. Then claim “it’s not possible to give everyone a hearing”, much less an appeal or any other due diligence? Nor can they send anyone back, even when they were wrong

It may only be for “those people” so far but we’ve arrived at gestapo midnight raids to fill concentration camps

LOL "anti American"
It is the most american thing ever.

Shoot all trespassers.

Badge or not, without a warrant it’s straight breaking and entering. Treat them as any common criminal breaking into your home since they are just cosplaying LE at that point

Can't wait to see it clash when someone blows away an ICE agent in a castle state

The person who would that, if they are somehow still alive, will be crucified by the state.

Yep

Once upon a time, German authorities decided to raid the home, or rather estate, of the local Hell's Angel boss. Police (SEK) came up to the door in civilian clothes and balaclavas, announced themselves as police. Boss inside panics, thinks it's a rival gang trying to take him out, grabs a shotgun, shoots a police through the door. Ultimately gets apprehended.

Police file murder charges. State attorney downgrades that to manslaughter. Judge says "WTF that was self defence if police don't want to get shot through the door they shouldn't be running around ringing doorbells in civilian clothes and balaclavas anybody can shout 'police open up!'". Still got nailed for illegal possession of firearms on top of everything else he was wanted for, of course. Welcome to German law where you can legally stand your ground with a full auto but are not allowed to own one.

Better to be judged by 12, than carried by 6.

A "memo". A fucking memo. No, this is a violation of the Constitution. Fuck your memo.

Considering ICE likes to abduct people in masks, civilian clothing and without any identification and thus are easily confused with burglars, i'd say shoot on sight for trespassing would be a viable option.

weird question, do i have to be black to join the black panthers

You can buy a gun and practice. Start a club with your neighbors.

There are clubs for every group you can imagine. Find one and protect yourself.

You might be better off looking into something like the Socialist Riffle Association and if they have a chapter in your area. No idea how good they are but I'm in the DSA and some people mention them as an option.

The Black Panthers arming themselves because of (I hope you're sitting down) police brutality is why assault weapons were first banned in California. Backed by Democrats, Republicans, and the NRA, and signed into law by Governor Ronald Reagan. I'm talking about The Mulford Act.

Just so you know how it's going to go.

"According to the memo, agents can break into a home if getting a warrant is “impracticable,” and they don’t need a judge’s approval."

They're going to have a fun time here in Oregon:

https://oregon.public.law/statutes/ors_161.219

"a person is not justified in using deadly physical force upon another person unless the person reasonably believes that the other person is:

(1) Committing or attempting to commit a felony involving the use or threatened imminent use of physical force against a person; or

(2) Committing or attempting to commit a burglary in a dwelling; or

(3) Using or about to use unlawful deadly physical force against a person. [1971 c.743 §23]"

They really haven’t thought this out long-term. The Panthers knew a thing or two about gun rights and the right to self-defense. These Nazi policies are endangering the state’s monopoly on violence.

Fellow Oregonian here and i love that you posted this!! Thank you!

Thanks. I have two guns in my home and will be keeping them close by and loaded.

No kids, just in case anyone was worried.

Read as: Enter your home under the false pretense they're looking for migrants, so they can search for any reason to charge you with a crime and toss you in a camp.

Sounds like a second amendment solution.

violent problems require violent solutions.

a “reasonable belief” that someone might be part of a Venezuelan gang is enough.

Considering they've actively deported someone for having a tattoo that supports autism awareness as evidence of being a Venezuelan gang member, the fact I had a burrito for lunch today is probably an equally "reasonable belief" for them.

This is an alarming suspension of all of the protections of the Constitution if this is allowed to stand.

I have a temporary tattoo, one of the plant ink ones that last for up to 2 weeks. It's a derpy black cat. Probably a Venezuelan gang symbol.

Probably a terrible idea ... but ... someone/people should hand out temporary MS13 tattoos at protests. Organize it so everyone can get one.

Straight to CECOT with you! /s

Hey, this guy had a burrito, let's get him! Also, we may as well pick up his family at the same time, and his neighbors if they make a fuss!

Don't forget to shoot my dog before you leave. /s

It's really the most humane solution since you'd all be unavailable to feed it.

Remember when democrats got all heated about G Gordon Liddy saying “if the feds come to your door, shoot them in the head” (to account for body armor)?

I don’t know why that popped into my head just now.

Don't do that.

Shoot them in the dick.

Seriously.

The lower abdomen is chock full o' arteries, and a hit on the pelvis is going to instantly drop someone; you can't walk with a pelvis that's been shattered by a 9mm. It's also generally an easier target.

Leg meta

I like your ideas.

Buckshot to the belt buckle.

BRB. Going to invest in Kevlar cod pieces.

They already exist. When you look at some of the overt armor that was/is used by the military--particularly the BALCS armors--the full kit will have shoulder/upper arm coverage, a high collar, and a flap that covers your lower abdomen. While these are mostly to protect against fragmentation, they should stop all handgun threats as well. Outside of GWOT and some SWAT teams, that kind of armor isn't common though, because it's bulky and very restrictive.

Oh, and a hit directly to the balls is gonna rupture a testicle anyway because of backface deformation. :)

A fair point, and head shots are notoriously difficult. Low center mass will hurt like fuck even if the armor goes down that far.

I would like to add, if they are in the process of breaking your door, and you have thin walls, shoot through the wall next to the door where they are likely waiting to start filing in.

https://youtube.com/shorts/XbYZhMMLHGo

This is both funny, and 100% accurate.

“Fuck your rights.” - the party who claims to love the constitution

If a bunch of armed guys in masks show up refusing to identify themselves or provide warrants, what do you think most people would assume they are???

In a country with more guns than people, this seems line an insanely stupid tactic that guarantees preventable tragedies.

Warrants get rubber stamped on a regular basis, the argument that it's suddenly too onerous a burden and they're just allowed to ignore our constitutional rights is pretty fucking absurd too.

law enforcement isn't known for it's critical thinking

It's the rubber stamping that is the problem. Sometimes they get a talking to when they get too rambunctious and kill a few innocent bystanders. Now there's no rules to bind them, so have at er!

Ok let me get this straight. There's no legal migrant anymore?

When did they mention migrants at all? The way this is written up is that anyone can be acted upon, all it requires is a "reasonable belief" that someone might be part of a Venezuelan gang. And lets face it, if they have their way no one will be checking anyone's documents before, during or after these raids.

actually anyone can be "considered illegal" they left enough vagueness in the policy.

The law nerd in me is intrigued by the idea of a Third Amendment issue arising in the wild.

The citizen in me is horrified that they'd even fucking try.

The 4th Amendment, against unreasonable search & siezure is the more appropriate one. The 3rd prohibits the government from forcing people to house soldiers. Its very rarely invoked, and SCOTUS has never ruled on it.

The 4th has been litigated often, and it REQUIRES probable cause, and a warrant signed by a judge. This nonsense is a blatant violation, and will not pass SCOTUS.

The memo and policy are not meant to survive Constitutional challenge. It facially and clearly violates it:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

No, this is meant to give the veneer of an arguably defensible policy, a temporary measure. And why would that be enough? Well, one possibility is that after a period of time it will not to matter anymore.

When wouldn't it matter anymore? Oh, say - just throwing this out there - if it ties the issue up in courts long enough for Trump to secure permanent dictatorial power after harassing or disappearing political opponents and judges.

The second amendment says that they can’t

The 2nd is most definitely a recommendation that they tread pretty damn lightly with this one.

Are people going to stand their ground when this happens?

There's a fair amount of instances of cops no-knocking and getting put on a T-shirt. Honestly, no-knocks were a super stupid concept and never ever should have taken off the way they did. ICE just barging in because "I am the warrant" is going to get a lot more cops pictures posted on GoFundMe

Fun fact, because no-knock and nighttime raids on armed suspects have always been a stupid idea, some states outright prohibit them. Even people as dumb as our legislators have been able to figure this out, albeit after many years of the blowhard infantry washouts who habitually pack our local police forces getting themselves popped.

100%

Put a bullet in the head of an ICE agent, see how many wanna go inside a home.

If anyone forces their way into my house without a warrant, they are getting shot.

Like fuck they can.

I'm not fucking going to El Salvador.

In California remember you have Castle Doctrine. Protecting yourself, your home, and property from unwarranted unannounced invasions from ANYONE allows you to use deadly force if available

Wait. CA allows the Castle Doctrine?

A quick search shows it does. I'll be damned.

I'll be damned as well.

Worth noting for any Californians that it u-turns if the person stops being a threat. If you threaten and they run away, you're now in the wrong if you shoot.

That's true pretty much everywhere. Shooting someone in the back will almost always get you charged, unless you're a cop.

Generally speaking--and I'm not a lawyer, I'm not your lawyer, and you should ask a criminal defense attorney in your state for specifics--you can use force, including lethal force, to protect your life if you have reasonable fear for your life or safety. Generally speaking, if someone is running away from you, they're no longer a direct threat, and therefore you can't use force. Similarly, if you are in a reasonable fear for your life, and you shoot someone, you can not kick them while they're bleeding on the ground.

I believe all states have some form of Castle Doctrine. Some states have a duty to retreat if you aren't in your home/car, e.g., you have to attempt to escape first. Some states require you to use proportionate force; if they have a baseball bat, you may not be allowed to use a firearm. Know the laws specific to your state.

That's all fair enough. I've seen it listed as a gotcha on some very pro-gun sites for the specific case of a thief who's taken something, jewelery for example, and is now running away. You can't take the offensive to get it back. (At least not with your gun. I expect trackling them to the ground would be fine?)

That gets much, much more state specific. I can tell you that a lot of stores with loss-prevention officers aren't keen on having them tackle shoplifters, since that can result in massive losses from lawsuits.

If you pull out a firearm you better fucking use it not threaten with it. because life and death is when it comes out not before.

In some states you have a duty to retreat as well. Something to consider.

I thought the whole point of Castle Doctrine is that you don't have to retreat because your home is the place of last retreat?

Wait...that's not true everywhere?

...Except cops. You do not have a legal right to resist illegal actions by police. The ONLY state where that's a legal right is Indiana. Look, I get it, you should have that right everywhere, but if you shoot a cop that's illegally breaking into your home, you will be arrested, charged, and convicted, IF you survive. And you probably won't.

Should you shoot them anyways? Absolutely. Just understand what the result will be.

This article implies that you wouldn't be breaking the law if you shot a cop entering your home unannounced and without a warrant:

https://campbelllawobserver.com/cops-not-robbers-the-clash-between-no-knock-warrants-and-the-castle-doctrine/

It also says that the cops are allowed to kill you, so having followed the law and being innocent will be small comfort.

What makes a cop a cop? Could we establish a new town, which would of course have its own police department, and everyone in that town is part of the department.

Yes, it's a bit of a facetious question. But we are entering very stupid times.

Well shit too bad Indiana hates my kind

I know, right? It's the broken clock that's so broken that it's only gotten the time right once.

Guess I need to move to CA.

It's totally fine everyone. Obviously this would only ever happen to poor people or bad people or other people /s.

Seriously though, where the fuck are all the people screaming about freedom?

Reminder that many states have "STAND YOUR GROUND" laws that include protecting you in the event you shoot someone claiming to be a federal agent who doesn't produce badges or a warrant.

Funny you think people will still get a fair trial (or even a trial at all instead of a bullet or "accident") in the United States after shooting someone from the regime.

it's encouraging to see Americans who still believe the law means anything. I hope you manifest it back into existence.

Enter my home without a warrant or identifying yourself, and your gonna leave in a casket.

I've also explained to my family that we do not open the door to anyone, especially people who claim to be cops. Way too easy to claim it, then force their way in while your waiting for them to prove who they are.

The way I see it, if ICE is trying to come into my home without a warrant, then they already intend for me to die. I'm a white natural born US citizen, but I've made my stance on kings in this country pretty clear, so a visit from the SS is a factor I have to be ready for. I'd rather die at home, taking a many of them with me as I can, then quietly allowing them to send me to a death camp, if I had to choose.

We don't want to live here right now, but we don't have the finances to leave. So instead, we're going to protect our home, and continue to support and participate in the actions against tyranny that we can. Protests, pressure on other elected officials to resist as well, etc.

Edit: Besides, if evil comes to your country and knocks at your door, shouldn't you fight it?

Can't wait to hear people like Alex Jones defend this. Can't wait for every sovcit to defend this. Can't wait for every Gadsden flag flag and bumper sticker to defend this.

And yet people keep telling me Democrats are just as bad.

Those GOSH DARN Democrats keep trying to feed and house immigrants with MY TAX DOLLARS.

Instead of putting them in cages and throwing them in prison. (AGAIN WITH TAX DOLLARS.)

Nobody says that. But you can pretend they do. T

Literally word for word what my co-worker said the day after the election.

And yet that ignores reality.

Incidentally, it's perfectly legal to own a mounted gatling gun on the top of your property.

Sure is, as long as it's crank operated! Dakka-dakka-dakka-dakka-dakka-dakka...

What the devil?!

https://www.reddit.com/r/copypasta/comments/8agaik/just_as_the_founding_fathers_intended/

Things are getting to a terrifying level.. 😭

Land of the free.

Home of the Depraved

There is no "legal" in America now. RESIST

Oh well. The not-at-all-obscure law I'm using states they better use hearing protection. Gunshots is loud.

Good to know that a Stetson University law degree isn’t worth the paper its printed on.

Yeah what you need to do is 2nd amendment some of those house invaders under the castle doctrine of your State

I'm sure they will only apply castle doctrine to non members of the state. So if you shoot an ice officer breaking into your house, without a warrant. They will still be found guilty of murder, if they are somehow taken alive.

"Hiel Trump" is required when people meet in public or private. Any hesitation must be treated with aggressive concern and reported to all, immediately. This is the only way to keep America safe from (insert current list of threats).

Gestapo did it first.

Oh, I literally just remembered my Mexican ex-roomie still gets his mail sent to my house

Well, everyone, the gun kept by the door for this exact reason is looking more and more like Im right to have it... Fuck

Keep it ready, but make sure it is also safely secured as well.

Bang bang bang.

Fun Fact: In Indiana, you can legally convert ICE agents into a fine red mist if they try this.

They have no legal protections while breaking the law.

Problem is... It then gets reduced to you shooting at people, and people shooting at you. That's seems like lose lose situation.

I mean, if you're going to die anyway, might as well take some assholes with you.

By the time they enter, if they do, it will no longer be my home. It will belong to my estate. Fuck this admin. I hope we survive it and learn from it, at least until the next century when we will have forgotten about it again.

This is a blatant violation of the 4th Amendment, and they are counting on the Supreme Court to back then, which they won't. Then they'll just ignore the Supreme Court, and do it anyway.

Which is why everyone needs to be arming themselves and open-carrying at protests moving forward.

Agree. They need to be extremely afraid of us. Politicians are greedy cowards, and they only respond to money and fear. We don't have money to bribe them like the Sociopathic Oligarchs, so we have to make their fear of us overwhelm their greed.

Yeah uhm the word "migrants" is written on a removable label ... fill in whichever citizen category you want to drag out of their houses...

You don't fill in labels, you're sorting punch cards.

For some reason, I keep thinking that people used to booby trap their doors to discourage these types of activities. I vaguely think this was an IRA thing?

Not sure if it actually happened or it was just something from a movie, but I'm curious what would happen after a few ICE raids were turned into meat sauce by door mounted claymores.

The reason it's illegal, is to protect firefighters and paramedics in case they need to enter a home.

What if this hypothetical booby-trap happens to be a fire suppression system that dispenses BandAids after ejecting the fascist piglets back out the front door at 300psi?

It's illegal. And they wouldn't change their policies.

They don't care about their agents.

I have a snake by my door. She's a completely harmless sweetheart, but nothing makes people think twice like answering the door while holding a snake.

But if you put that energy into better securing your door, you’d have a much cheaper solution that doesn’t hurt firefighters (they may not be able to save your ass but that’s your choice) and make it much more difficult, time consuming, and noisy to get in.

One of those vertical bars into the floor ought to do it

This is fucked.

MA~~G~~NA Make America Nazi again

I said we would have late night, door to door searches by year's end,

They're running early

The only time the Alien Enemies act should be used is in an extreme emergency: Say, for example, an orange man wanting to press a big red button to burn the world to cinders.

ICE, if it truly wanted to do things the right way, can do the 'practicable', by waiting for judges and their juries to render judgement. As we have clearly seen, ICE doesn't measure up to even basic sense nor decency. Here's hoping that ICE is broken by the people, for the people.

I FULLY Support this! If the Founders KNEW what the Future held they WOULDNT have written the Constitution the Way they Had!

-Pro Life Americans who FERVENTLY Defend School Shooters after they MURDER a School full of 6 Year Olds because the Founders could NEVER be Wrong!

Something something illegal search and seizure blah blah blah, meaningless paper to the people who claim it to be the one all, be all document.

Someone is going to get killed.

I hope a lot of them (ICE agents) do. I wonder where all these gun toting larpers who take guns to walmart to "protect the innocent" are?

Too busy sucking at the teat of tyranny.

Hitler actually changed the constitution to get his fascism off the ground, in this case the courts are apparently useless, so they don’t even have do that!

Report a MAGAt today!

Oops, thought it was a republican breaking into my house. ICE does love wearing those masks because they know what they're doing is wrong, sorry not sorry.

And it was. I don't like guns, but I live in a shithole with fascists 🤷

No, They can not, It is a violation of the constitution. Which dumb fuck also is in violation of.

Sounds a little too familiar

Then they're going to be introduced to the floor.

Face floor towards enemy?

I mean, they can enter

On the path to Hitlerism just an excuse so they can disappear anyone against the facist party

Shoot warrantless masked unconstitutional kidnappers and ask questions later.

Well, thats one way to get rid of them. Cleaning up the mess is on you though

It'shard to keep up with all the shit, but didn't the supreme court rule they couldn't use this act? Does a "DOJ memo" override a supreme court ruling?

Pop Pop

Weird place to reference Magnitude from Community but okay.

And what the US citizens will do about this ? Enough is enough when your country gets geopardized and still couple protests won't do it.

🔫

Lol, lmao

They absolutely can’t.

Send bachelors.

Look, I’m going to risk… being misunderstood here… but I’m going to link to this article by way of pointing out how using subject lines that inspire disgust and apathy is how corporate social media works to divide and paralyze people. It’s in this article and it’s something to think about:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/google-x-and-facebook-are-modern-day-tobacco-companies/

Cuz the Blondie General sez so.

Nope

I'm scared of migrants hiding in my closet and under my bed please protect me ICE.

Listen, your family migrated here like a 100 years ago from Europe... so we'll just assume you're Tren de Aragua. What? No, this has nothing to do with you being an intellectual or a lefty. Now get in the concentration ca-I mean; the extralegal detention centre... yes, that's it.

Since when does a agencies memo outbid the constitution?

nothing will go wrong with this well-thought out plan

Enjoy your freedumb America. You voted for this insanity. Fucking morons.

Have you noticed how all the people that were so uppity about not voting for Harris have now largely fallen silent? And how the genocide of Palestinians has largely continued unabated? Because I sure have.

I'm sure the other people living in the US legally that were shipped off to El Salvador thought the same thing.

Abrego Garcia is the only one viewed as a "legal citizen", despite entering the country illegally.

Give me a list of legal citizens that have been deported to El Salvador.

Just to be clear, Abrego Carcia was not viewed as a US citizen but was in the US legally. This could be the same case for many others that have been sent to the prison camp but how exactly are we supposed know when none of them have been their due process?

How can it even be acceptable to send someone to a foreign prison indefinitely without sentence, even if they were in the US illegally?

Lol do you think that actually matters to these people?

With hate like this the goal posts are always moving, searching for a new scapegoat...

You are a fool if you think that process won't turn against you.

Glad that you took the bait.

Here is the thing I don't get, you didn't win this interaction. I demonstrated that you are a disengenous fool, in public, and you walked away from this interaction looking like a hateful idiot to everybody else in this conversation.

If that is "taking the bait" I mean ok? I love taking the bait then.

Sometimes I think trolls don't realize that in a system like this, trolling people with edgey disengenous comments that try to push a line of "just joking with my hate but am I?" totally backfires and provides a massive public platform to be picked apart by people that aren't full of shit.

Every time you interact with someone like me and get your ass handed to you from people pointing out you are a shallow asshole, you lose? You make people that hold your beliefs look weak, unable to rhetorically defend their positions beyond kneejerk hate and just plain unattractive.

If your objective is to stoke xenophobia and hate by encouraging people to hate illegal immigrants you just did the opposite by publicly taking that position and then showing how hateful and shallow your reasons were for taking that position.. which reflects badly in most peoples eyes on the whole anti-immigrant vibe.

Y'all are a bunch of loser incels, and I hope you keep providing us opportunities to point that out in public :)

midwest.social

Rules

  1. No porn.
  2. No bigotry, hate speech.
  3. No ads / spamming.
  4. No conspiracies / QAnon / antivaxx sentiment
  5. No zionists
  6. No fascists

Chat Room

Matrix chat room: https://matrix.to/#/#midwestsociallemmy:matrix.org

Communities

Communities from our friends:

Donations

LiberaPay link: https://liberapay.com/seahorse